Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (21)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nasca, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mahoney, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nasca, P. C.
Right arrow Articles by Mahoney, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 136, No. 11: 1316-1320
Copyright © 1992 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

The Relation between Multiple Births and Maternal Risk of Breast Cancer

Philip C. Nasca, Aura Weinstein, Mark Baptiste and Martin Mahoney

Bureau of Cancer Epidemiology, New York State Department of Health Corning Tower, Room 565, the Governor Nelson A Rockefeller Empire State Plaza, Albany, NY 12237.

Reprint requests to Dr Nasca at this address

Data from two case-control studies conducted in New York State during 1982–1986 were used to examine the relation between multiple births and the maternal risk of breast cancer. The cases were 2, 561 women between 20 and 79 years of age with a diagnosis of primary breast cancer. Controls (n=2, 616) were selected from driver's license files and matched to cases by year of birth and country of residence. The odds ratio for any multiple birth was 0.94 (95%confidence interval (Cl) 0.56–1.56) in women less than 55 years of age and 0.95 (95%Cl 0.62–1.46) in women aged 55–79 years. A previous study had shown a muliple last birth to be protective against breast cancer in women less than 55 years of age (odds ratio (OR)=0.60, 95%Cl 0.43–0.85). A decreased risk of breast cancer was also observed for this age group in the present study, but the magnitude of the effect was not as strong and the confidence interval included unity (OR = 0.85, 95% Cl 0.43–1.68). A logistic model that controlled for age at first pregnancy, number of live births, age, and county of residence increased the odds ratio to 0.97 for a multiple last birth. The current study does not support an association between multiple births and maternal risk of breast cancer. Am J Epidemiol 1992; 136;1316–20.

breast neoplasms; case-control studies; pregnancy; multiple


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Endocr Relat CancerHome page
J. Ji, A. Forsti, J. Sundquist, and K. Hemminki
Risks of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancers after twin births
Endocr. Relat. Cancer, September 1, 2007; 14(3): 703 - 711.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
R. Troisi, N. Potischman, and R. N. Hoover
Exploring the Underlying Hormonal Mechanisms of Prenatal Risk Factors for Breast Cancer: A Review and Commentary
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., September 1, 2007; 16(9): 1700 - 1712.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. D. Peck, B. S. Hulka, D. A. Savitz, D. Baird, C. Poole, and B. E. Richardson
Accuracy of Fetal Growth Indicators as Surrogate Measures of Steroid Hormone Levels during Pregnancy
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2003; 157(3): 258 - 266.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. D. Peck, B. S. Hulka, C. Poole, D. A. Savitz, D. Baird, and B. E. Richardson
Steroid Hormone Levels during Pregnancy and Incidence of Maternal Breast Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., April 1, 2002; 11(4): 361 - 368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.