Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (67)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vena, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brasure, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vena, J. E.
Right arrow Articles by Brasure, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 134, No. 2: 180-185
Copyright © 1991 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

Use of Electric Blankets and Risk of Postmenopausal Breast Cancer

John E. Vena, Saxon Graham, Rosemary Hellmann, Mya Swanson and John Brasure

Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University at Buffalo, State University of New York Buffalo, NY

Reprint requests to Dr. John E. Vena, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, 2211 Main Street, Bldg. A, Buffalo, NY 14214.

Chronic exposure to 60-Hz electromagnetic fields has been hypothesized to increase breast cancer risk by suppressing the normal nocturnal rise in pineal melatonin. From 1987 to 1989 in western New York the authors investigated the use of electric blankets as a risk factor for breast cancer in a case-control study of postmenopausal women aged 41–85 years. A study population of 382 cases and 439 randomly selected community controls was queried regarding use in the previous 10 years, the frequency of use by season, and the mode of use. After adjusting for age and education, the odds ratio (OR) for use of an electric blanket in the past 10 years (33% of cases, 35% of controls) was 0.89 (95% confidence interval (95% Cl) 0.66–1.19), and the risk did not differ in a dose-response fashion by the number of years used. The risk associated with daily use relative to nonuse was 0.97 (95% Cl 0.70–1.35). Use sometimes to warm the bed and sometimes throughout the night was not associated with risk (OR = 0.64, 95% Cl 0.40–1.05). The risk of breast cancer among those who used the blanket continuously throughout the night was 1.31 (95% Cl 0.88–1.95). Those who reported daily use in season, continuously throughout the night for the past 10 years did not have significantly elevated risk (OR = 1.25, 95% Cl 0.73–2.16). Adjustment for the Quetelet index and reproductive risk factors did not alter the results. These findings do not support the hypothesis that electric blanket use is associated with an increased risk for breast cancer. The slightly elevated estimate of risk for the most frequent electric blanket users and the potential public health significance of electromagnetic field exposure suggest that further inquiries be undertaken. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 180–5.

breast neoplasms; electromagnetics


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. S. O'Leary, G. C. Kabat, E. R. Schoenfeld, and M. C. Leske
RE: "USE OF ELECTRIC BEDDING DEVICES AND RISK OF BREAST CANCER IN AFRICAN-AMERICAN WOMEN"
Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2004; 159(12): 1201 - 1201.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. J. London, J. M. Pogoda, K. L. Hwang, B. Langholz, K. R. Monroe, L. N. Kolonel, W. T. Kaune, J. M. Peters, and B. E. Henderson
Residential Magnetic Field Exposure and Breast Cancer Risk: A Nested Case-Control Study from a Multiethnic Cohort in Los Angeles County, California
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2003; 158(10): 969 - 980.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
K. Zhu, S. Hunter, K. Payne-Wilks, C. L. Roland, and D. S. Forbes
Use of Electric Bedding Devices and Risk of Breast Cancer in African-American Women
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2003; 158(8): 798 - 806.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
E. R. Schoenfeld, E. S. O'Leary, K. Henderson, R. Grimson, G. C. Kabat, S. Ahnn, W. T. Kaune, M. D. Gammon, and M. C. Leske
Electromagnetic Fields and Breast Cancer on Long Island: A Case-Control Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2003; 158(1): 47 - 58.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. A. McElroy, P. A. Newcomb, A. Trentham-Dietz, J. M. Hampton, M. S. Kanarek, and P. L. Remington
Endometrial Cancer Incidence in Relation to Electric Blanket Use
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2002; 156(3): 262 - 267.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
S. Davis, D. K. Mirick, and R. G. Stevens
Residential Magnetic Fields and the Risk of Breast Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol., March 1, 2002; 155(5): 446 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
F. Laden, L. M. Neas, P. E. Tolbert, M. D. Holmes, S. E. Hankinson, D. Spiegelman, F. E. Speizer, and D. J. Hunter
Electric Blanket Use and Breast Cancer in the Nurses' Health Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2000; 152(1): 41 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. D. Gammon, H. Hibshoosh, M. B. Terry, S. Bose, J. B. Schoenberg, L. A. Brinton, J. L. Bernstein, and W. D. Thompson
Cigarette Smoking and Other Risk Factors in Relation to p53 Expression in Breast Cancer among Young Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 1999; 8(3): 255 - 263.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
P. K Verkasalo, E. Pukkala, J. Kaprio, K. V Heikkila, and M. Koskenvuo
Magnetic fields of high voltage power lines and risk of cancer in Finnish adults: nationwide cohort study
BMJ, October 26, 1996; 313(7064): 1047 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.