Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (26)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Calle, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Khoury, M. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Calle, E. E.
Right arrow Articles by Khoury, M. J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 134, No. 1: 69-77
Copyright © 1991 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

other

Completeness of the Discharge Diagnoses as a Measure of Birth Defects Recorded in the Hospital Birth Record

Eugenia E. Calle1, and Muin J. Khoury2

1American Cancer Society Atlanta, GA
2Division of Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilties, Center for Environmental Health and Injury Control, Centers for Disease Control Atlanta, GA

Reprint requests to Dr. Eugenia E. Calle, American Cancer Society, 1599 Clifton Road, N.E., Atlanta, GA 30329.

Licensed hospitals usually maintain a discharge diagnoses index, which provides an inexpensive tool for the surveillance of birth defects diagnosed shortly after birth. Government agencies in several states routinely use discharge diagnoses for this purpose. To evaluate the completeness of the discharge diagnoses, the authors compared birth defects noted in the discharge diagnoses with those noted anywhere in the hospital birth record in a cohort of 3,421 infants born to US Army veterans from 1966 to 1986. In this cohort, 237 birth defect cases were documented in hospital birth records, and 49% of those cases were missed in the discharge diagnoses (28% of major defect cases and 66% of minor defect cases). The extent of missed defects varied greatly by organ system and by specific defect. Significant predictors of a missed defect were the presence of multiple defects, female sex, and western region of birth. The underascertainment of defects in the discharge diagnoses should be considered in the development and operation of surveillance systems using this source of data. Am J Epidemiol 1991; 134: 69–77.

abnormalities; diagnosis; hospital records; infant; newborn; information systems


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br J OphthalmolHome page
J. S Rahi, B. Botting, and The British Congenital Cataract Interest Group
Ascertainment of children with congenital cataract through the National Congenital Anomaly System in England and Wales
Br J Ophthalmol, September 1, 2001; 85(9): 1049 - 1051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 IOVSHome page
J. S. Rahi and C. Dezateaux
Measuring and Interpreting the Incidence of Congenital Ocular Anomalies: Lessons from a National Study of Congenital Cataract in the UK
Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci., June 1, 2001; 42(7): 1444 - 1448.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
D. N. Cowan, R. F. DeFraites, G. C. Gray, M. B. Goldenbaum, and S. M. Wishik
The Risk of Birth Defects among Children of Persian Gulf War Veterans
N. Engl. J. Med., June 5, 1997; 336(23): 1650 - 1656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.