Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (45)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Helmer, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Syme, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Helmer, D. C.
Right arrow Articles by Syme, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 133, No. 2: 112-122
Copyright © 1991 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

Hostility and Coronary Artery Disease

Dianne C. Helmer, David R. Ragland and S. Leonard Syme

From the School of Public Health, University of California Berkeley, CA

Reprint requests to Dr David R Ragfand, Department of Biornedicai and Enviorsiiental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720

Studies of the association between type A behavior and coronary heart disease have yielded inconsistent findings. A possible explanation for these inconsistent findings is that type A behavior is simply a marker for other behaviors that are truly related to coronary heart disease. Hostility is one such behavior that has been found in several recent studies to predict coronary heart disease and coronary atherosclerosis; however, several other studies have found null results. In the present study, the predictive power of hostility was tested in a study population of hospitalized men (n = 118) and women (n = 40) scheduled for coronary angiography. Potential coronary risk behaviors were assessed in the angiography patients and they were given the type A Structured Interview. Hostility was measured with the Cook-Medley Hostility Inventory and the Behavior Pattern Hostility Index, a measure of hostility derived from the type A Structured Interview. No significant positive associations were found for either Cook- Medley hostility or behavior pattern hostility and coronary occlusion. This was true whether hostility or coronary occlusion was treated as a dichotomous variable or as a continuous variable. In fact, most of the observed associations were opposite to the predicted direction, although none was statistically significant. Replicating cutpoints of the Cook-Medley Hostility Inventory used in other studies that have reported positive associations with coronary heart disease also yielded null findings. The association between hostility and coronary occlusion was slightly modified by age and sex, but the interaction coefficients were not significant. The sample size yielded adequate statistical power to detect the hypothesized associations, and there was no evidence that selection bias, measurement error, or unexamined confounding accounted for the null findings. These results failed to confirm some earlier reports showing a positive association between hostility and coronary artery disease. Am J Epidomiol 1991 ;133:1 12–22.

angiography; arteriosclerosis; coronary disease; hostility; risk factors; type A personality


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
M. B. Olson, D. S. Krantz, S. F. Kelsey, C. J. Pepine, G. Sopko, E. Handberg, W. J. Rogers, G. L. Gierach, C. K. McClure, C. N. B. Merz, et al.
Hostility Scores Are Associated With Increased Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Women Undergoing Coronary Angiography: A Report from the NHLBI-Sponsored WISE Study
Psychosom Med, July 1, 2005; 67(4): 546 - 552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
E. D. Eaker, L. M. Sullivan, M. Kelly-Hayes, R. B. D'Agostino Sr, and E. J. Benjamin
Anger and Hostility Predict the Development of Atrial Fibrillation in Men in the Framingham Offspring Study
Circulation, March 16, 2004; 109(10): 1267 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Pulkki, M. Kivimaki, M. Elovainio, J. Viikari, and L. Keltikangas-Jarvinen
Contribution of Socioeconomic Status to the Association between Hostility and Cardiovascular Risk Behaviors: A Prospective Cohort Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 15, 2003; 158(8): 736 - 742.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
R. S. Jorgensen, J. J. Frankowski, L. J. Lantinga, K. Phadke, R. P. Sprafkin, and K. W. Abdul-Karim
Defensive Hostility and Coronary Heart Disease: A Preliminary Investigation of Male Veterans
Psychosom Med, May 1, 2001; 63(3): 463 - 469.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
M. C. Whiteman, I. J. Deary, and F. G. R. Fowkes
Personality and Social Predictors of Atherosclerotic Progression: Edinburgh Artery Study
Psychosom Med, September 1, 2000; 62(5): 703 - 714.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
C. Iribarren, S. Sidney, D. E. Bild, K. Liu, J. H. Markovitz, J. M. Roseman, and K. Matthews
Association of Hostility With Coronary Artery Calcification in Young Adults: The CARDIA Study
JAMA, May 17, 2000; 283(19): 2546 - 2551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
S. A. Everson, G. A. Kaplan, D. E. Goldberg, T. A. Lakka, J. Sivenius, and J. T. Salonen
Anger Expression and Incident Stroke : Prospective Evidence From the Kuopio Ischemic Heart Disease Study
Stroke, March 1, 1999; 30(3): 523 - 528.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
R. P. Sloan, P. A. Shapiro, E. Bagiella, M. M. Myers, and J. M. Gorman
Cardiac Autonomic Control Buffers Blood Pressure Variability Responses to Challenge: A Psychophysiologic Model of Coronary Artery Disease
Psychosom Med, January 1, 1999; 61(1): 58 - 68.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.