Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (37)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DEANE, M.
Right arrow Articles by NEUTRA, R. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by DEANE, M.
Right arrow Articles by NEUTRA, R. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 129, No. 5: 894-904
Copyright © 1989 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

ADVERSE PREGNANCY OUTCOMES IN RELATION TO WATER CONTAMINATION, SANTA CLARA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, 1980–1981

MARGARET DEANE1,, SHANNA H. SWAN1, JOHN A. HARRIS2, DAVID M. EPSTEIN1 and RAYMOND R. NEUTRA1

1Epidemiological Studies and Surveiliance Section, California Department of Health Services Berkeley, CA
2California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, Department of Health Services Berkeley, CA

Reprint requests to Margaret Deane, Epidemiological Studies and Survelliance Section, Department of Health Services, 2151 Berkeley Way, Rm. 510, Berkeley, CA 94704

An epidemiologic study was conducted to investigate a suspected cluster of adverse outcomes of pregnancies conceived in 1980–1981 among women who resided in a census tract in Santa Clara County, California that was thought to be exposed to drinking water from a well contaminated by an organic solvent, trichloroethane. A comparison census tract that received water from a different source was selected on the basis of demographic comparability. The cluster was confirmed; the odds ratio for spontaneous abortion was 2.3 (95% confidence interval (CI) 1.3–4.2) after adjustment by multiple logistic regression for maternal risk factors, including maternal age, alcohol consumption, smoking, and prior fetal loss. The relative risk for congenital malformations was 3.1 (95% CI 1.1–10.4). Because of the lack of precise information on the timing and extent of contamination, the pattern of spontaneous abortion rates throughout the study period cannot be used to either support or refute a causal inference.

abnormalities; abortion; hydrocarbons, chlorinated; pregnancy; teratogens; water pollution, chemical


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M. J Nieuwenhuijsen, M. B Toledano, N. E Eaton, J. Fawell, and P. Elliott
Chlorination disinfection byproducts in water and their association with adverse reproductive outcomes: a review
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2000; 57(2): 73 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval RevHome page
D. L. Anderton, A. B. Anderson, P. H. Rossi, J. M. Oakes, M. R. Fraser, E. W. Weber, and E. J. Calabrese
Hazardous Waste Facilities: "Environmental Equity" Issues in Metropolitan Areas
Eval Rev, April 1, 1994; 18(2): 123 - 140.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.