Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (41)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KAUFMAN, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by SHAPIRO, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KAUFMAN, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by SHAPIRO, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 129, No. 4: 703-711
Copyright © 1989 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

TAR CONTENT OF CIGARETTES IN RELATION TO LUNG CANCER

DAVID W. KAUFMAN1,, JULIE R. PALMER1, LYNN ROSENBERG1, PAUL STOLLEY2, ELLEN WARSHAUER3 and SAMUEL SHAPIRO1

1Slone Epidemiolo Unit School of Public Health, Boston University School of Medicine, Brookline, MA
2Department of Medicine Section of General Medicine, Clinical Epidemiology Unit, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
3Epidemiology and Preventive Medical Services, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Institute New York, NY

Reprint requests to Dr. David W. Kaufman, Slone Epidemiology Unit, School of Public Health, Boston University School of Medicine, 1371 Beacon Street, Brookline, MA 02146

Although it is generally considered estabtiehed that the risk of lung cancer is directly related to the tar content of cigarettes, an examination of the results of previous studies does not yield conclusive evidence in favor of the hypothesis. The authors evaluated this issue in a study of 881 cases of lung cancer and 2, 570 hospital controls who wore 40 to 69 years of age; data were collected by interview in hospitals in the United States and Canada from November 1981 to June 1986. For each year of smoking, cigarette brands were classified according to their tar content as published in regular Federal Trade Commission reports (from 1967 to 1985) or the Reader's Digest (from 1957 to 1966). Tar values for years for which there was no published information were estimated by interpolation. Smokers were divided, according to the tar content of their cigarette brands averaged over a specified period, into low (<22 mg/cigarette), medium (22–28 mg/cigarette), and high (≥29 mg/cigarette) tar smokers. When the average tar content was based on cigarettes smoked at least 10 years previously, the relative risk estimates for medium and high tar smokers compared with law tar smokers were 3.0 and 4.0 after control for potentially confounding factors, including the number of cigarettes smoked per day. The trend was significant (p = 0.002). The tendency for the risk of lung cancer to Increase with increasing tar content was consistent among men and women. The results provide further support for the hypothesis that the tar content of cigarettes is directly related to lung cancer risk. However, the data were limIted in that there were very few subjects whose lifetime tar exposure averaged less than 10 mg/cigarette.

lung neoplasms; smoking; tars


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
R. Mehra, B. A. Moore, K. Crothers, J. Tetrault, and D. A. Fiellin
The association between marijuana smoking and lung cancer: a systematic review.
Arch Intern Med, July 10, 2006; 166(13): 1359 - 1367.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
C. M Papamichael, K. A Aznaouridis, K. S Stamatelopoulos, E. N Karatzis, A. D Protogerou, T. G Papaioannou, J. P Lekakis, and M. E Mavrikakis
Endothelial dysfunction and type of cigarette smoked: the impact of 'light' versus regular cigarette smoking
Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2004; 9(2): 103 - 105.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J. E Harris, M. J Thun, A. M Mondul, and E. E Calle
Cigarette tar yields in relation to mortality from lung cancer in the cancer prevention study II prospective cohort, 1982-8
BMJ, January 10, 2004; 328(7431): 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
D. R. Brooks, J. R. Palmer, B. L. Strom, and L. Rosenberg
Menthol Cigarettes and Risk of Lung Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2003; 158(7): 609 - 616.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
P. G. Shields
Tobacco Smoking, Harm Reduction, and Biomarkers
J Natl Cancer Inst, October 2, 2002; 94(19): 1435 - 1444.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
W. H. Sauer, J. A. Berlin, B. L. Strom, C. Miles, J. L. Carson, and S. E. Kimmel
Cigarette Yield and the Risk of Myocardial Infarction in Smokers
Arch Intern Med, February 11, 2002; 162(3): 300 - 306.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Tobacco ControlHome page
M. J Thun and D. M Burns
Health impact of ""reduced yield"" cigarettes: a critical assessment of the epidemiological evidence
Tob. Control, December 1, 2001; 10(90001): i4 - 11.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
J.-L. Tang, J. K Morris, N. J Wald, D. Hole, M. Shipley, and H. Tunstall-Pedoe
Mortality in relation to tar yield of cigarettes: a prospective study of four cohorts
BMJ, December 9, 1995; 311(7019): 1530 - 1533.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
BMJHome page
S Parish, R Collins, R Peto, L Youngman, J Barton, K Jayne, R Clarke, P Appleby, V Lyon, S Cederholm-Williams, et al.
Cigarette smoking, tar yields, and non-fatal myocardial infarction: 14000 cases and 32000 controls in the United Kingdom
BMJ, August 19, 1995; 311(7003): 471 - 477.
[Abstract] [Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.