Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (23)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WELLS, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by FEINSTEIN, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by WELLS, C. K.
Right arrow Articles by FEINSTEIN, A. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 128, No. 5: 1016-1026
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

DETECTION BIAS IN THE DIAGNOSTIC PURSUIT OF LUNG CANCER

CAROLYN K. WELLS1, and ALVAN R. FEINSTEIN2

1Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, CT
2Departments of Internal Medicine and Epidemiology, Yale University School of Medicine New Haven, CT Cooperative Studies Program Coordinating Center, Veterans Administration Medical Center West Haven, CT

Reprint requests to Carolyn K. Wells, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar Street, I-456 SHM, New Haven, CT 06510

Autopsy studies have shown that lung cancer is often not detected during life and that a correct antemortem diagnosis is made preferentially in patients with pulmonary symptoms, in smokers, and in men. The current research was done as a case-control study to determine whether the autopsy suggestions of detection bias in diagnostic pursuit of lung cancer were confirmed by the way that sputum Papanicolaou smears (Pap smears) were ordered in an inpatient setting. The cases were 385 hospitalized patients in whom sputum Pap tests had been newly performed from October 1977 to September 1980. Each case was matched by age, admission date, and admission diagnosis to a control patient who had not received a Pap test. Excluded from the study were patients in whom sputum Pap tests were obligatory (e.g., those with manifestations of hemoptysis) or unnecessary (e.g., those with a previous diagnosis of lung cancer or multiple previous sputum Pap tests). Demographic data, amount and duration of cigarette smoking, and details of clinical manifestations were extracted from the patients' medical records by research assistants blind to the study hypothesis. Compared with controls, the cases had distinctive elevations in odds ratios for chronic cough, recent cough, male sex, and cigarette smoking, which also showed a distinctive dose-response relation. In multivanate analyses, all four of these "risk factors" for selective ordering of a sputum Pap smear remained Independently highly significant. In the extreme category, men who smoked and coughed were 22 times more likely to have a sputum Pap test ordered than were nonsmoking women who did not cough. Clinically, the results suggest that women and nonsmokers may be deprived of appropriate diagnosis and therapy unless a diagnostic workup for lung cancer is guided mainly by radiographic findings and presenting manifestations. Statistically, detection bias has probably led to an excessively elevated magnitude for the cigarette smoking-lung cancer association and to a falsely low estimate of Incidence rates in women.

diagnosis; diagnostic tests; routine; lung neoplasms


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Fam PractHome page
W. Hamilton and D. Sharp
Diagnosis of lung cancer in primary care: a structured review
Fam. Pract., December 1, 2004; 21(6): 605 - 611.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. D. Stein, R. D. Hull, K. C. Patel, R. E. Olson, W. A. Ghali, A. K. Alshab, and F. A. Meyers
Venous Thromboembolic Disease: Comparison of the Diagnostic Process in Men and Women
Arch Intern Med, July 28, 2003; 163(14): 1689 - 1694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eval Health ProfHome page
A. M. Bernard, R. A. Hayward, J. S. Rosevear, and L. F. McMahon Jr.
Gender and Hospital Resource Use: Unexpected Differences
Eval Health Prof, June 1, 1993; 16(2): 177 - 189.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.