Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (74)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by BOND, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by FLORES, G. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by BOND, G. G.
Right arrow Articles by FLORES, G. H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 128, No. 2: 343-351
Copyright © 1988 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health

research-article

VALIDATION OF WORK HISTORIES OBTAINED FROM INTERVIEWS

GREGORY G. BOND1,, KENNETH M. BODNER1, WENDY SOBEL1, RITA J. SHELLENBERGER2 and GEORGE H. FLORES2

1The Dow Chemical Company, Epidemiology, Health and Environmental Sciences 1803 Building, Midland, MI 48674
2Dow Chemical U.S.A., Texas Operations Building B-101, Freeport, TX

Reprint requests to Dr. Gregory G. Bond

There have been few attempts to assess the validity of occupational histories obtained from interviews. A nested case-control study of lung cancer conducted in 1985 among a cohort of 19,608 male workers at a Texas chemical production facility provided such an opportunity. Telephone interviews were attempted with 308 lung cancer patients and 588 matched controls or their next of kin in order to gather information on tobacco use, diet, places of residence, and occupations. Interview data from 734 respondents (143 subjects and 591 next of kin) were then compared with the records of work area assignments maintained by the company and with exposure profiles developed by an industrial hygienist. Respondents recalled 48.4 per cent of all documented work area assignments, but only 2.6 per cent of the chemical agents judged as likely exposures. Recall of usual work area assignment was 70.8 per cent. Among the factors found to have most influenced recall were the number and durations of assignments, a subjective assessment of the quality of the interview, and the relationship of the interview respondent to the subject. The elapsed time from job assignment to interview was also found to affect recall of the longest assignment of the subject.

epidemiologic methods; occupational diseases; questionnaire; retrospective studies; sensitivity and specificity (epidemiology)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Phil Trans R Soc BHome page
D. C Glass and M. R Sim
The challenges of exposure assessment in health studies of Gulf War veterans
Phil Trans R Soc B, April 29, 2006; 361(1468): 627 - 637.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
K Teschke, A F Olshan, J L Daniels, A J De Roos, C G Parks, M Schulz, T L Vaughan, and H Kromhout
Occupational exposure assessment in case-control studies: opportunities for improvement
Occup. Environ. Med., September 1, 2002; 59(9): 575 - 594.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
P. S. Bakke, R. Hanoa, and A. Gulsvik
Relation of Occupational Exposure to Respiratory Symptoms and Asthma in a General Population Sample: Self-reported versus Interview-based Exposure Data
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 1, 2001; 154(5): 477 - 483.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 ThoraxHome page
S. Humerfelt, G. E Eide, and A. Gulsvik
Association of years of occupational quartz exposure with spirometric airflow limitation in Norwegian men aged 30-46 years
Thorax, August 1, 1998; 53(8): 649 - 655.
[Abstract] [Full Text]

Home page
 NEJMHome page
L. S. Newman
Occupational Illness
N. Engl. J. Med., October 26, 1995; 333(17): 1128 - 1134.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.