Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (110)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KVÂLE, G.
Right arrow Articles by EIDE, G. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KVÂLE, G.
Right arrow Articles by EIDE, G. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 126, No. 5: 831-841
Copyright © 1987 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF REPRODUCTIVE FACTORS AND BREAST CANCER

I. PARITY

GUNNAR KVÂLE1,, IVAR HEUCH2 and GEIR EGIL EIDE3

1Institute of Hygiene and Social Medicine, University of Bergen Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
2Department of Mathematics, University of Bergen Norway
3Section for Medical Informatics and Statistics, University of Bergen Norway

Reprint requests to Dr. Gunnar KvÂle, Institute of Hygiene and Social Medicine, N-5016 Haukeland Sykehus, Norway

The relation between childbearing and breast cancer risk was investigated in a prospective study of 63,090 Norwegian women, among whom 1,565 breast cancer cases occurred in a follow-up from 1961 through 1980. The authors observed a strong and highly significant inverse association between the number of full-term pregnancies and the risk of breast cancer. The association was consistently found in all subgroups according to demographic variables and was obtained for all histologic subtypes except for cases classified as Paget's disease. The relation with parity could not be explained by confounding with age at first birth or other reproductive factors. The apparent protective effect of high parity was strongest in the groups with an early first birth, and no such effect could be established among women with their first birth at age 35 or later. The protective effect of muttiparity was observed for cancers in all age groups. Uniparous women had, however, higher risk of developing breast cancer under age 60 than nulliparous women. Those who reported at least one abortion had somewhat lower risk than those who did not, but no trend according to the number of abortions was observed.

abortion; breast neoplasms; parity; prospective studies


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. Sweeney, C. K. Blair, K. E. Anderson, D. Lazovich, and A. R. Folsom
Risk Factors for Breast Cancer in Elderly Women
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2004; 160(9): 868 - 875.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
M. Mahue-Giangreco, G. Ursin, J. Sullivan-Halley, and L. Bernstein
Induced Abortion, Miscarriage, and Breast Cancer Risk of Young Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., March 1, 2003; 12(3): 209 - 214.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
C. M. D'Cruz, S. E. Moody, S. R. Master, J. L. Hartman, E. A. Keiper, M. B. Imielinski, J. D. Cox, J. Y. Wang, S. I. Ha, B. A. Keister, et al.
Persistent Parity-Induced Changes in Growth Factors, TGF-{beta}3, and Differentiation in the Rodent Mammary Gland
Mol. Endocrinol., September 1, 2002; 16(9): 2034 - 2051.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. A. Thompson, P-L. Chen, R. A. King, S. S. Rich, W. S. Oetting, C. Armstrong, A. R. Folsom, and T. A. Sellers
BRCA1 Susceptibility Markers and Postmenopausal Breast Cancer: The Iowa Women's Health Study
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2000; 9(5): 507 - 511.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
Bibliography
Current Sociology, January 1, 1998; 46(1): 128 - 144.



Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Melbye, J. Wohlfahrt, J. H. Olsen, M. Frisch, T. Westergaard, K. Helweg-Larsen, and P. K. Andersen
Induced Abortion and the Risk of Breast Cancer
N. Engl. J. Med., January 9, 1997; 336(2): 81 - 85.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
P. A. Newcomb, B. E. Storer, M. P. Longnecker, R. Mittendorf, E. R. Greenberg, and W. C. Willett
Pregnancy Termination in Relation to Risk of Breast Cancer
JAMA, January 24, 1996; 275(4): 283 - 287.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. Lambe, C.-c. Hsieh, D. Trichopoulos, A. Ekbom, M. Pavia, and H.-O. Adami
Transient Increase in the Risk of Breast Cancer after Giving Birth
N. Engl. J. Med., July 7, 1994; 331(1): 5 - 9.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
JAMAHome page
T. Colton, E. R. Greenberg, K. Noller, L. Resseguie, C. Van Bennekom, T. Heeren, and Y. Zhang
Breast Cancer in Mothers Prescribed Diethylstilbestrol in Pregnancy: Further Follow-up
JAMA, April 28, 1993; 269(16): 2096 - 2100.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.