Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (30)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KELLIE, SHIRLEY. E.
Right arrow Articles by CASTELLAN, R. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by KELLIE, SHIRLEY. E.
Right arrow Articles by CASTELLAN, R. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 125, No. 3: 437-444
Copyright © 1987 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


research-article

SPIROMETRY VARIABILITY CRITERIA-ASSOCIATION WITH RESPIRATORY MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN A COHORT OF COAL MINERS

SHIRLEY. E. KELLIE1,, MICHAEL D. ATTFIELD2, JOHN L. HANKINSON2 and ROBERT M. CASTELLAN2

1Department of Preventive Medicine and Community Health, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Health Sciences Center P.O. Box 6998, Chicago, IL 60680
2Division of Respiratory Disease Studies, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Morgantown WV

Reprint requests to Dr. Shirley E. Kellie

To clarify the association between spirometry variability and respiratory morbidity and mortality, the authors analyzed data for miners examined in the first round of the National Coal Study, 1969–1971, and they compared groups of miners who failed with those who met each of two spirometry variability criteria: a 5% criterion recommended by the American Thoracic Society, and a 200 ml criterion used in prior research studies. Compared with miners who met the 5% criterion (the best two forced vital capacities must be within 5% or 100 ml of one another), the group that failed had a lower moan for forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), and odds ratios for cough, phlegm, wheeze, shortness of breath, and death of 1.75, 1.67, 1.76, 2.71, and 1.30, respectively. The findings for the 200 ml criterion (the best two FEV1s must be within 200 ml of one another) were somewhat different The group that failed versus the group that met this criterion had a higher moan for FEV1, and odds ratios for cough, phlegm, wheeze, shortness of breath, and death of 1.13, 1.07, 1.15, 1.43, and 0.94, respectively. Although the findings differ for the two criteria, the findings demonstrate that increased spirometry variability is associated with poorer health.

pneumoconiosis; respiratory function tests; spirometry


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
PediatricsHome page
S. Schuh, P. T. Dick, D. Stephens, M. Hartley, S. Khaikin, L. Rodrigues, and A. L. Coates
High-Dose Inhaled Fluticasone Does Not Replace Oral Prednisolone in Children With Mild to Moderate Acute Asthma
Pediatrics, August 1, 2006; 118(2): 644 - 650.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
O. C. Ioachimescu, S. B. Venkateshiah, M. S. Kavuru, K. McCarthy, and J. K. Stoller
Estimating FVC From FEV2 and FEV3: Assessment of a Surrogate Spirometric Parameter
Chest, September 1, 2005; 128(3): 1274 - 1281.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
C. A. Holcroft, E. A. Eisen, S. R. Sama, and D. H. Wegman
Measurement Characteristics of Peak Expiratory Flow
Chest, August 1, 2003; 124(2): 501 - 510.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ChestHome page
A. Kelley, E. Garshick, E. R. Gross, S. L. Lieberman, C. G. Tun, and R. Brown
Spirometry Testing Standards in Spinal Cord Injury
Chest, March 1, 2003; 123(3): 725 - 730.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.