Skip Navigation



American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published online on July 31, 2008

American Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/aje/kwn180
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
168/6/665    most recent
kwn180v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by James, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2008. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Letter to the Editor

RE: "BROTHERS AND REDUCTION OF THE BIRTH WEIGHT OF LATER-BORN SIBLINGS"

William H. James

The Galton Laboratory, University College London, London NW 1 2 HE, United Kingdom

(e-mail: whjames{at}waitrose.com)

In a recent Journal article, Nielsen et al. reported that later-born siblings (of both sexes) with preceding brothers weighed significantly less at birth compared with controls with no preceding brothers. The authors suggested that this phenomenon might be explained by "maternal immune reactions directed against the H-Y antigens initiated during pregnancies with boys" (1, p. 480).

This association between birth weights of later siblings and the sex of their preceding siblings is susceptible to an alternative explanation: there are independent associations of each with maternal testosterone levels. Substantial quantities of data have been adduced to support the hypothesis that mammalian (including human) hormone levels around the time of conception are associated with the sex of the resulting offspring, high levels of testosterone (in either parent) being associated with the subsequent production of sons (2, 3). Moreover, high testosterone levels in pregnant women at 17 and 33 weeks of gestation are reportedly associated with fetal growth restriction in utero (4). This latter association is apparently causal because administering testosterone to pregnant ewes reportedly leads to significantly reduced birth weights of lambs of both sexes (5). This potential explanation regarding the data of Nielsen et al. (1) suggests that proponents of the maternal immune hypothesis should present direct immunologic data to support their idea.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References

  1. Nielsen HS, Mortensen L, Nygaard U, et al. Brothers and reduction of the birth weight of later-born siblings. Am J Epidemiol (2008) 167:480–4.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. James WH. Evidence that mammalian sex ratios at birth are partially controlled by parental hormone levels at the time of conception. J Theor Biol (1996) 180:271–86.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
  3. James WH. Further evidence that mammalian sex ratios at birth are partially controlled by parental hormone levels around the time of conception. Hum Reprod (2004) 19:1250–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Carlsen SM, Jacobsen G, Romundstad P. Maternal testosterone levels during pregnancy are associated with offspring size at birth. Eur J Endocrinol (2006) 155:365–70.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Manikkam M, Crespi EJ, Doop DD, et al. Fetal programming: prenatal testosterone excess leads to fetal growth retardation and postnatal catch-up growth in sheep. Endocrinology (2004) 145:790–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
168/6/665    most recent
kwn180v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by James, W. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by James, W. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?