Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on January 4, 2007
American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165(6):667-676; doi:10.1093/aje/kwk054
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
165/6/667    most recent
kwk054v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buring, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buring, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2007 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Alcohol Consumption and Breast Cancer Risk in the Women's Health Study

Shumin M. Zhang1,2, I-Min Lee1,2, JoAnn E. Manson1,2,3, Nancy R. Cook1,2, Walter C. Willett2,3,4 and Julie E. Buring1,2,5

1 Division of Preventive Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
2 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
3 Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
4 Department of Nutrition, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
5 Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Correspondence to Dr. Shumin M. Zhang, Division of Preventive Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Avenue East, Boston, MA 02215 (e-mail: shumin.zhang{at}channing.harvard.edu).

Received for publication May 27, 2006. Accepted for publication August 21, 2006.


   ABSTRACT
TOP
 ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
The authors assessed the association between moderate alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk in the Women's Health Study (United States, 1992–2004). During an average of 10 years of follow-up, 1,484 cases of total breast cancer (1,190 invasive and 294 in situ) were documented among 38,454 women who, at baseline, were free of cancer and cardiovascular disease and provided detailed dietary information, including alcohol consumption, for the preceding 12 months. Higher alcohol consumption was associated with a modest increase in breast cancer risk; the multivariable relative risks for ≥30 g/day of alcohol vs. none were 1.32 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.82) for total breast cancer and 1.43 (95% CI: 1.02, 2.02) for invasive breast cancer. An increased risk was limited to estrogen receptor (ER)– and progesterone receptor (PR)–positive tumors; the multivariable relative risks for an increment of 10 g/day of alcohol were 1.11 (95% CI: 1.03, 1.20) for ER+PR+ tumors (804 cases), 1.00 (95% CI: 0.81, 1.24) for ER+PR– tumors (125 cases), and 0.99 (95% CI: 0.82, 1.20) for ER–PR– tumors (167 cases). The association also seemed strongest among those taking postmenopausal hormones currently, but the test for interaction was not significant. The findings from this prospective study suggest that moderate alcohol consumption increases breast cancer risk.

alcohol drinking; breast neoplasms; prospective studies; receptors, estrogen; receptors, progesterone

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor; PR, progesterone receptor


   INTRODUCTION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
A direct association between moderate alcohol consumption and the occurrence of breast cancer has been consistently observed in epidemiologic studies (1–5). The positive association has been noted for beer, wine, and liquor separately (2). Epidemiologic data also provide strong evidence for an influence of plasma estrogens on breast cancer risk (6, 7). In human experimental studies (8–11), alcohol consumption has been shown to affect plasma estrogens and it has thus been speculated that alcohol consumption might increase risk of breast cancer at least in part through its effect on estrogens (12). The effects of estrogen and progesterone on cell growth and differentiation are mediated through steroid hormone receptors (13, 14). Because of a lack of information on steroid hormone receptor status or limited statistical power, sparse data are available on the potential difference between alcohol consumption and risk of breast tumors of different hormone receptor status, and the findings have been inconsistent (3–5, 15–23). To better understand the mechanisms of the alcohol–breast cancer association, we examined the relation between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk according to joint estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) status in the Women's Health Study.


   MATERIALS AND METHODS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 
Study cohort
The Women's Health Study is a recently completed, randomized trial evaluating the benefits and risks of low-dose aspirin and vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer among 39,876 US female health professionals (registered nurses, 75 percent) aged 45 years or older (24–27). Upon enrollment in the study, all participants completed a baseline questionnaire about their medical history and lifestyle characteristics, including potential risk factors for breast cancer. As of the end of the trial, March 31, 2004, the average duration of follow-up was 10 years, and follow-up rates for morbidity and mortality were 97.2 percent and 99.4 percent, respectively (24–26).

Assessment of alcohol consumption
Information on the average frequency of consumption of alcoholic beverages including beer, wine, and liquor during the preceding 12 months was collected on the enrollment questionnaire and the food frequency questionnaire during the run-in phase. Total alcohol intake was considered the sum of the alcohol content in beer, wine, and liquor, assuming 12.8 g of ethanol for 360 ml (12 ounces) of regular beer, 11.3 g for 360 ml (12 ounces) of light beer, 11.0 g for 120 ml (4 ounces) of wine, and 14.0 g for 45 ml (1.5 ounces) of liquor. To reduce within-person variation, we used the average of alcohol intake from two reports in the present analysis. The Spearman correlation coefficient was 0.88 for alcohol intake calculated from two reports at baseline. A validation study among a subset of participants in another study, the Nurses' Health Study, indicated a high correlation (r = 0.84) between alcohol intake measured by the 1984 food frequency questionnaire (similar to that used for the Women's Health Study) and four 1-week dietary records in 1980 (28). In addition, alcohol consumption assessed by the 1984 food frequency questionnaire was correlated with plasma concentrations of high density lipoprotein cholesterol (r = 0.40), which is known to be sensitive to alcohol (28).

Food frequency questionnaire
Detailed information on dietary intake was provided by 39,345 (98.7 percent) of the randomized participants who completed and returned a self-administered, 131-item food frequency questionnaire mailed to them during the run-in phase of the trial. This dietary questionnaire, which has been used by the Nurses' Health Study and the Nurses' Health Study II, asked participants about the average frequency of consumption of specific foods and beverages during the preceding 12 months. For each food listed on the questionnaire, a commonly used unit or portion size was specified with nine responses, ranging from "never" to "6 or more times per day." Nutrient intake was computed by multiplying the frequency response by the nutrient content of the specified portion size. Values for nutrients were derived from US Department of Agriculture sources (29) and were supplemented with information from manufacturers. The validity and reliability of the food frequency questionnaires used in the Nurses' Health Study suggest that nutrient intakes calculated from the food frequency questionnaires reasonably reflect the long-term intakes of female health professionals (30–32). The current analysis was restricted to 38,454 women after excluding those who did not provide dietary information, had an implausible total energy intake (<600 kcal/day or >3,500 kcal/day), or reported cancers after randomization that had been diagnosed prior to randomization.

Ascertainment of breast cancer cases
Every 6 months during the first year, and then annually, women completed brief mailed questionnaires about the occurrence of newly diagnosed endpoints, including breast cancer. When a diagnosis of breast cancer was reported, we requested permission from the participant, or next of kin if deceased, to examine the relevant medical records, and we obtained medical records from the hospital or attending physicians. Deaths of participants were identified by reports from family members, postal authorities, and a search of the National Death Index.

An Endpoints Committee of physicians reviewed the medical records for final confirmation of a reported diagnosis of breast cancer. Additional details on breast cancer, including hormone receptor status, were also recorded from reports in medical records. The presence or absence of hormone receptor status was determined by laboratories affiliated with hospitals in which breast cancer cases were diagnosed. Medical records confirmed approximately 98 percent of self-reported breast cancer cases in the Women's Health Study (33). Through March 31, 2004, we ascertained 1,484 confirmed breast cancer cases (1,190 invasive and 294 in situ) and included their data in this analysis. Of the 1,190 invasive cancers, 804 (67.6 percent) were positive for both ER and PR (ER+PR+), 125 (10.5 percent) were positive for ER but negative for PR (ER+PR–), 23 (1.9 percent) were ER–PR+, 167 (14.0 percent) were ER–PR–, and 71 (6.0 percent) were unknown for ER or PR. Tumors classified as borderline positive for ER (n = 5) or PR (n = 8) were considered ER+ or PR+ in the analyses. Of the 1,190 invasive cancers, 1,101 were assayed for ER and 1,085 for PR, and nearly all assays were measured by using immunocytochemical or immunohistochemical methods (92.6 percent for ER and 92.4 percent for PR).

Statistical analysis
Person-years of observation for each participant were calculated from the date of randomization to the date of diagnosis of cancer, death, or March 31, 2004, whichever occurred first. Alcohol intake was modeled as both predetermined categories (none, 0.1–4.9, 5.0–9.9, 10.0–14.9, 15.0–29.9, or ≥30.0 g/day) and a continuous variable (a 10-g/day increment). These categories of alcohol were used in a previous meta-analysis of alcohol and breast cancer combining primary data from six large cohorts (2).

Hazard ratios (expressed as relative risks) were calculated by dividing the incidence rate in each of the higher categories by the incidence rate in the lowest category using Cox proportional hazards regression models (34). We first estimated hazard ratios and their 95 percent confidence intervals, with adjustments for age (per-year increment) and randomized treatment assignment (aspirin vs. placebo, vitamin E vs. placebo). In multivariable analysis, we simultaneously included well-established risk factors for breast cancer, which have the potential to confound the association between alcohol and breast cancer risk, in the multivariable model, including age at menarche (<12, 12, 13, 14, or ≥15 years), age at first pregnancy lasting ≥6 months (<25, 25–29, or ≥30 years), number of pregnancies lasting ≥6 months (0, 1 or 2, 3 or 4, or ≥5), menopausal status (premenopausal, postmenopausal, or uncertain menopausal), age at menopause (<45, 45–49, 50–54, or ≥55 years), postmenopausal hormone use (never, past <5 years, past ≥5 years, current <5 years, or current ≥5 years), body mass index (<23, ≥23 to <25, ≥25 to <27, ≥27 to <30, or ≥30 kg/m2), family history of breast cancer in the mother or a sister (yes or no), history of benign breast disease (yes or no), physical activity (quartiles of total calories expended on recreational activities and stair climbing), multivitamin supplement use (never, past, or current), and total energy intake (quintiles). We adjusted for total energy to control for confounding and to reduce measurement errors due to general over- or underreporting of food items (32).

We examined alcohol consumption in relation to risk of total breast cancer. We also performed an analysis for invasive breast cancer according to combined ER and PR status (ER+PR+, ER+PR–, ER–PR–, and unknown) using polychotomous logistic regression; ER–PR+ breast cancer cases (n = 23) were excluded. We modeled each specific alcoholic beverage in relation to breast cancer separately, as well as included all of them simultaneously in the model. Additional analyses of alcohol consumption further stratified women by categories of menopausal status, body mass index, postmenopausal hormone use, family history of breast cancer, history of benign breast disease, and total folate intake to assess whether the associations were stronger in subgroups, especially among those with higher estrogen exposure or with lower folate intake. Several studies have found that higher folate intake reduces the excess risk of breast cancer due to alcohol consumption (35–37). Tests for multiplicative interaction between an increment of 10 g/day of alcohol and other risk factors in relation to breast cancer risk were performed by log-likelihood ratio tests comparing the models with or without interaction terms. Tests for trend were conducted by using the median values for categories of alcohol intake as a continuous variable. All p values were two sided.


   RESULTS
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
DISCUSSION
 References
 
Approximately 13.4 percent of women drank at least 10 g/day of alcohol, which is about 0.75–1 drink per day (table 1). Women whose alcohol consumption was higher were slightly older, weighed less, and consumed more calories. They were also more likely to have a late age at menarche and fewer births. Age at menopause, physical activity, age at first birth, menopausal status, current use of postmenopausal hormones, current use of multivitamin supplements, family history of breast cancer in the mother or a sister, and personal history of benign breast disease did not appear to differ according to alcohol consumption.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 1. Age-standardized baseline characteristics* according to alcohol consumption in the Women's Health Study, United States, 1992–2004

 
Higher alcohol consumption was associated with a modest increase in breast cancer risk; the multivariable relative risks for ≥30 g/day of alcohol versus none were 1.32 (95 percent confidence interval (CI): 0.96, 1.82) for total breast cancer and 1.43 (95 percent CI: 1.02, 2.02) for invasive breast cancer (table 2). The multivariable relative risks for an increment of 10 g/day of alcohol were 1.07 (95 percent CI: 1.01, 1.14) for total breast cancer and 1.09 (95 percent CI: 1.02, 1.16) for invasive breast cancer. To address the potential bias that breast cancer itself, before it was diagnosed, might have affected alcohol consumption, we excluded 253 total breast cancer cases diagnosed during the first 2 years of follow-up; the positive association did not change appreciably. The multivariable relative risks for an increment of 10 g/day of alcohol were 1.08 (95 percent CI: 1.02, 1.15) for total breast cancer and 1.10 (95 percent CI: 1.03, 1.18) for invasive breast cancer.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 2. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals of breast cancer according to alcohol consumption in the Women's Health Study, United States, 1992–2004

 
The risk of developing ER+PR+ breast cancers increased with increasing categories of alcohol intake (p for trend = 0.02), although the risk estimates were not statistically significant, except for the category of 10.0–14.9 g/day of alcohol. However, alcohol consumption was not significantly associated with risk of ER+PR– (p for trend = 0.97) or ER–PR– breast tumors (p for trend = 0.79) (table 2). The multivariable relative risks for an increment of 10 g/day of alcohol were 1.11 (95 percent CI: 1.03, 1.20) for ER+PR+ tumors, 1.00 (95 percent CI: 0.81, 1.24) for ER+PR– tumors, and 0.99 (95 percent CI: 0.82, 1.20) for ER–PR– tumors. When alcohol was classified into four categories (0, >0 to <3.4, 3.4 to 9.9, ≥10 g/day) used in the Swedish Mammography Cohort (5), the multivariable relative risks comparing the higher three categories of alcohol with none were 0.99 (95 percent CI: 0.83, 1.18), 0.98 (95 percent CI: 0.79, 1.22), and 1.28 (95 percent CI: 1.04, 1.58) for ER+PR+ tumors; 1.07 (95 percent CI: 0.69, 1.66), 1.31 (95 percent CI: 0.79, 2.18), and 1.10 (95 percent CI: 0.63, 1.92) for ER+PR– tumors; and 1.13 (95 percent CI: 0.78, 1.64), 1.15 (95 percent CI: 0.73, 1.82), and 1.13 (95 percent CI: 0.69, 1.84) for ER–PR– tumors.

Positive associations between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk existed for alcohol derived from different beverages (beer, white wine, and liquor), although the associations for white wine and liquor were not statistically significant (table 3). These associations did not noticeably change after mutually controlling for other sources of alcoholic beverages. Red wine consumption was not associated with breast cancer risk. The positive associations between alcohol and breast cancer risk did not differ appreciably according to categories of other risk factors, except that there appeared to be a stronger risk among women who were current users of postmenopausal hormones, although the test for interaction was not significant (p for interaction = 0.07) (table 4). When we examined alcohol intake and postmenopausal hormone use in combination, the multivariable relative risk of total breast cancer was 1.84 (95 percent CI: 1.37, 2.46) for women who consumed ≥10 g/day of alcohol and used postmenopausal hormones currently compared with women who were both nondrinkers of alcohol and never users of postmenopausal hormones.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 3. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals of breast cancer for a 10-g/day increment in alcohol consumption from different sources in the Women's Health Study, United States, 1992–2004

 

View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 4. Relative risks and 95% confidence intervals of breast cancer for a 10-g/day increment in alcohol consumption in different subgroups of women in the Women's Health Study, United States, 1992–2004

 

   DISCUSSION
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
References
 
In this large cohort of women, we found a modest and significant positive association between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk. This association was mostly limited to ER+PR+ tumors or those women using postmenopausal hormones. The prospective design and high follow-up rates minimize the possibility that our findings are due to methodological biases. Because controlling for established risk factors for breast cancer had minimal effect on the relative risks, our results are unlikely to be explained by confounding. Our results are also unlikely to be explained by the potential bias that breast cancer itself, before it was diagnosed, might have affected alcohol consumption, because the relative risks after excluding breast cancer cases diagnosed within the first 2 years of follow-up were similar to those for the entire cohort.

In this study, daily consumption of 10 g/day of alcohol (about 0.75–1 drink) was significantly associated with a 9 percent increase in risk of invasive breast cancer, and the risk increased with increasing categories of alcohol; consumption of ≥30 g/day of alcohol was significantly associated with a 43 percent increase in risk. These magnitudes of association are consistent with the findings from a pooled analysis using primary data from six prospective cohorts, in which an increment of 10 g/day of alcohol was significantly associated with a 9 percent increase in risk of invasive breast cancer, and alcohol intakes of ≥30 to <60 g/day vs. none were significantly associated with a 41 percent increase in risk (2). Similarly, in a meta-analysis of 38 case-control and cohort studies, daily consumption of one alcoholic drink was statistically associated with an 11 percent increase in the risk of breast cancer, and the risk increased with increasing number of drinks of alcohol per day (1). Consistent with the previous investigations (2), the positive association was noted for beer, wine, and liquor separately in the present study, suggesting alcohol per se rather than some congener is responsible for the increase in risk. In this study, alcohol from white, rather than red, wine accounted for the positive association; although this finding could be related to the more frequent consumption of white wine than red wine in this population, it warrants further investigation.

To our knowledge, the Iowa Women's Health Study and the Swedish Mammography Cohort study are the only two other large prospective studies that have examined the association of alcohol intake with joint ER and PR status, and the results were mixed. In the Swedish Mammography Cohort, alcohol intake was associated with an elevated risk of both ER+PR+ and ER+PR– breast tumors, but not with ER–PR+ and ER–PR– breast tumors (5). In contrast, alcohol intake was most strongly associated with ER–PR– tumors in the Iowa Women's Health Study (18). Our findings that alcohol was associated with ER+PR+ tumors, but not with ER–PR– and ER+PR– tumors, are in general consistent with the results from the Swedish Mammography Cohort. The small number of cases in the present analysis, however, precluded us from calculating precise estimates of the association between alcohol and ER+PR– tumors. We also did not have enough cases to evaluate the association between alcohol and ER–PR+ tumors. Overall pooled estimates from these three prospective studies showed a significant positive association for ER+PR+ tumors, but not for ER–PR– and ER+PR– tumors (table 5). Although our data on the presence or absence of hormone receptors were determined from laboratories affiliated with hospitals in which breast cancer cases were diagnosed and not from a single reference laboratory, the measurement of hormone receptors has been standardized, and the distribution of hormone receptors in the Women's Health Study is comparable to those reported in previous studies for postmenopausal women (38, 39).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]

  		TABLE 5. Epidemiologic studies of alcohol consumption and risk of breast cancer according to joint ER* and PR* status

 
Several case-control studies have also examined the relation of alcohol consumption with breast cancer risk by joint ER and PR status; two reported that alcohol was more clearly associated with ER+PR+ breast cancer than with ER–PR– breast cancer (4, 23); two reported an increased risk for ER+PR+ tumors, but not for ER+PR– and ER–PR– tumors (3, 20); one reported an increased risk for ER+PR+, ER–PR–, and ER–PR+ tumors, except for ER+PR– tumors (22); but two other studies reported no association irrespective of joint ER and PR status, in which alcohol consumption was categorized into only two levels (ever vs. never) (19, 21). Overall pooled estimates from these case-control studies were similar for ER+PR+ and ER–PR– tumors, but the relative risk was significant for ER–PR– tumors (table 5). Three other case-control studies observed positive associations of alcohol consumption with risk of either ER+ or ER– tumors (15, 16) or with ER+ tumors only (17).

Clinically, breast cancer is a heterogeneous group of tumors (40). The hormone receptor status of breast cancer has been used to predict a patient's response to hormonal manipulation and clinical course, select patients for adjuvant hormonal therapy, and define types of breast tumors (18, 38). The etiology of hormone receptor–defined breast cancers may also be heterogeneous (41). Reproductive factors that increase breast cancer risk tended to be associated with ER+ but not ER– tumors (41). However, it is less clear whether there is a different association of alcohol with breast cancer by hormone receptor status.

A potential mechanism for the alcohol–breast cancer association is through the estrogen pathway (42); therefore, alcohol may be predominantly associated with breast cancers expressing hormone receptors. In cell culture, addition of alcohol stimulated ER signaling (43, 44) and cell proliferation of ER+ human breast cancer cells but not of ER– cells (43). In an intervention study among premenopausal women, consumption of two alcoholic drinks daily for 3 months significantly increased plasma and urinary levels of total and bioavailable estrogens (45). In an intervention study among postmenopausal women not using hormone replacement therapy, consumption of 15 or 30 g/day of alcohol for 8 weeks was associated with a nonsignificant 5–10 percent increase in estrone sulfate and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels (8). Consistent with these data, the present study found that alcohol consumption was positively associated with ER+PR+ breast cancers, but not with ER–PR– cancers, suggesting that alcohol may act in part through the estrogen pathway to affect breast cancer risk. We recognize that, in the Women's Health Study, the number of cases in higher alcohol intake categories in the analyses of ER+PR– and ER–PR– was still small and thus may have reduced statistical power to observe a significant association. Alcohol may also affect breast cancer risk by acting as a co-carcinogen, increasing permeability of cell membranes to carcinogens, being mutagenic through acetaldehyde, inhibiting detoxification of carcinogens, activating pro-carcinogens, inducing oxidative stress (46), and affecting folate metabolism (47).

Along with three other large cohorts—the Nurses' Health Study (48), the Iowa Women's Health Study (49), and the Swedish Mammography Cohort (5)—the present analysis in the Women's Health Study also showed a stronger association between alcohol consumption and breast cancer risk among those using postmenopausal hormones, although the interaction was not statistically significant. Studies of acute effects of alcohol on estrogen metabolism among postmenopausal women indicate that alcohol has a much more pronounced effect in women using estrogen replacement therapy than in those who do not (12). In three studies of postmenopausal women using transdermal estradiol or oral estrogen, alcohol ingestion caused an acute, dramatic increase in circulating estradiol levels (9–11) and prolonged half-life of estradiol (10). However, alcohol does not appear to have a marked acute effect on circulating estradiol or estrone levels in normal-weight postmenopausal women who do not use estrogen replacement therapy (11). A recent study has also shown that mammographic density was strongest among women consuming high levels of alcohol and taking estrogens (50). These data suggest that alcohol can alter estrogen metabolism, and the use of both estrogen and alcohol may increase risk of breast cancer more than the use of either one alone (12).

In summary, the findings from this study concur with those from other studies in showing that moderate alcohol consumption is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. Furthermore, the present data suggest that the alcohol–breast cancer association may be at least partly mediated by the estrogen pathway. Given that breast cancer is considered more than one entity biologically, future epidemiologic research needs to consider hormone receptor status to better understand the mechanisms of the associations.


   ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
 
This study was supported by research grants CA-47988 and HL-43851 from the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, Maryland). Dr. Shumin M. Zhang is supported in part by the National Cancer Institute Career Development Award (CA096619).

The authors thank Eduardo Pereira and Dr. Yiqing Song for their statistical analytic support. They acknowledge the contributions of the entire staff of the Women's Health Study under the leadership of David Gordon, as well as Mary Breen, Susan Burt, Marilyn Chown, Georgina Friedenberg, Inge Judge, Jean Mac-Fadyean, Geneva McNair, David Potter, Claire Ridge, and Harriet Samuelson. The authors also acknowledge the Endpoints Committee of the Women's Health Study (Dr. Wendy Y. Chen) and Natalya Gomelskaya for their assistance with the manuscript.

Conflict of interest: none declared.


   References
TOP
 ABSTRACT
 INTRODUCTION
 MATERIALS AND METHODS
 RESULTS
 DISCUSSION
 References
 

  1. Longnecker MP. (1994) Alcoholic beverage consumption in relation to risk of breast cancer: meta-analysis and review. Cancer Causes Control 5:73–82.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  2. Smith-Warner SA, Spiegelman D, Yaun SS, et al. (1998) Alcohol and breast cancer in women: a pooled analysis of cohort studies. JAMA 279:535–40.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Li CI, Malone KE, Porter PL, et al. (2003) The relationship between alcohol use and risk of breast cancer by histology and hormone receptor status among women 65–79 years of age. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:1061–6.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cotterchio M, Kreiger N, Theis B, et al. (2003) Hormonal factors and the risk of breast cancer according to estrogen- and progesterone-receptor subgroup. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 12:1053–60.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Suzuki R, Ye W, Rylander-Rudqvist T, et al. (2005) Alcohol and postmenopausal breast cancer risk defined by estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a prospective cohort study. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:1601–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Key T, Appleby P, Barnes I, et al. (2002) Endogenous sex hormones and breast cancer in postmenopausal women: reanalysis of nine prospective studies. J Natl Cancer Inst 94:606–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Thomas HV, Reeves GK, Key TJ. (1997) Endogenous estrogen and postmenopausal breast cancer: a quantitative review. Cancer Causes Control 8:922–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  8. Dorgan JF, Baer DJ, Albert PS, et al. (2001) Serum hormones and the alcohol-breast cancer association in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 93:710–15.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Ginsburg ES, Walsh BW, Gao X, et al. (1995) The effect of acute ethanol ingestion on estrogen levels in postmenopausal women using transdermal estradiol. J Soc Gynecol Investig 2:26–9.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  10. Ginsburg ES, Walsh BW, Shea BF, et al. (1995) The effects of ethanol on the clearance of estradiol in postmenopausal women. Fertil Steril 63:1227–30.[ISI][Medline]
  11. Ginsburg ES, Mello NK, Mendelson JH, et al. (1996) Effects of alcohol ingestion on estrogens in postmenopausal women. JAMA 276:1747–51.[Abstract]
  12. Ginsburg ES. (1999) Estrogen, alcohol and breast cancer risk. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol 69:299–306.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  13. Pike MC, Spicer DV, Dahmoush L, et al. (1993) Estrogens, progestogens, normal breast cell proliferation, and breast cancer risk. Epidemiol Rev 15:17–35.[Medline]
  14. Clemons M and Goss P. (2001) Estrogen and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 344:276–85.[Free Full Text]
  15. McTiernan A, Thomas DB, Johnson LK, et al. (1986) Risk factors for estrogen receptor-rich and estrogen receptor-poor breast cancers. J Natl Cancer Inst 77:849–54.[ISI][Medline]
  16. Cooper JA, Rohan TE, Cant EL, et al. (1989) Risk factors for breast cancer by oestrogen receptor status: a population-based case-control study. Br J Cancer 59:119–25.[ISI][Medline]
  17. Nasca PC, Liu S, Baptiste MS, et al. (1994) Alcohol consumption and breast cancer: estrogen receptor status and histology. Am J Epidemiol 140:980–8.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Potter JD, Cerhan JR, Sellers TA, et al. (1995) Progesterone and estrogen receptors and mammary neoplasia in the Iowa Women's Health Study: how many kinds of breast cancer are there? Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4:319–26.[Abstract]
  19. Yoo KY, Tajima K, Miura S, et al. (1997) Breast cancer risk factors according to combined estrogen and progesterone receptor status: a case-control analysis. Am J Epidemiol 146:307–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Enger SM, Ross RK, Paganini-Hill A, et al. (1999) Alcohol consumption and breast cancer oestrogen and progesterone receptor status. Br J Cancer 79:1308–14.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  21. Huang WY, Newman B, Millikan RC, et al. (2000) Hormone-related factors and risk of breast cancer in relation to estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status. Am J Epidemiol 151:703–14.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Britton JA, Gammon MD, Schoenberg JB, et al. (2002) Risk of breast cancer classified by joint estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor status among women 20–44 years of age. Am J Epidemiol 156:507–16.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Terry MB, Zhang FF, Kabat G, et al. (2006) Lifetime alcohol intake and breast cancer risk. Ann Epidemiol 16:230–40.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  24. Cook NR, Lee IM, Gaziano JM, et al. (2005) Low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cancer: the Women's Health Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294:47–55.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Lee IM, Cook NR, Gaziano JM, et al. (2005) Vitamin E in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease and cancer: the Women's Health Study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 294:56–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Ridker PM, Cook NR, Lee IM, et al. (2005) A randomized trial of low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med 352:1293–304.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Rexrode KM, Lee IM, Cook NR, et al. (2000) Baseline characteristics of participants in the Women's Health Study. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 9:19–27.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  28. Giovannucci E, Colditz G, Stampfer MJ, et al. (1991) The assessment of alcohol consumption by a simple self-administered questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 133:810–17.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. US Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service. (1993) USDA Nutrient Database for Standard Reference, release 10: Nutrient Data Laboratory home page. (http://www.ars.usda.gov/main/site_main.htm?modecode=12354500).
  30. Willett WC, Sampson L, Stampfer MJ, et al. (1985) Reproducibility and validity of a semiquantitative food frequency questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 122:51–65.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Willett WC, Sampson L, Browne ML, et al. (1988) The use of a self-administered questionnaire to assess diet four years in the past. Am J Epidemiol 127:188–99.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  32. Willett WC. (1998) Nutritional epidemiology(Oxford University Press, New York, NY).
  33. Lee IM, Rexrode KM, Cook NR, et al. (2001) Physical activity and breast cancer risk: the Women's Health Study (United States). Cancer Causes Control 12:137–45.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  34. Cox DR. (1972) Regression models and life tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc (B) 34:187–220.
  35. Zhang S, Hunter DJ, Hankinson SE, et al. (1999) A prospective study of folate intake and the risk of breast cancer. JAMA 281:1632–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  36. Rohan TE, Jain MG, Howe GR, et al. (2000) Dietary folate consumption and breast cancer risk. J Natl Cancer Inst 92:266–9.[Free Full Text]
  37. Sellers TA, Kushi LH, Cerhan JR, et al. (2001) Dietary folate intake, alcohol, and risk of breast cancer in a prospective study of postmenopausal women. Epidemiology 12:420–8.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  38. Thorpe SM. (1988) Estrogen and progesterone receptor determinations in breast cancer. Technology, biology and clinical significance. Acta Oncol 27:1–19.[ISI][Medline]
  39. Gapstur SM, Potter JD, Drinkard C, et al. (1995) Synergistic effect between alcohol and estrogen replacement therapy on risk of breast cancer differs by estrogen/progesterone receptor status in the Iowa Women's Health Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 4:313–18.[Abstract]
  40. Henderson IC and Patek AJ. (1998) The relationship between prognostic and predictive factors in the management of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 52:261–88.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  41. Althuis MD, Fergenbaum JH, Garcia-Closas M, et al. (2004) Etiology of hormone receptor-defined breast cancer: a systematic review of the literature. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13:1558–68.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  42. Singletary KW and Gapstur SM. (2001) Alcohol and breast cancer: review of epidemiologic and experimental evidence and potential mechanisms. JAMA 286:2143–51.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  43. Singletary KW, Frey RS, Yan W. (2001) Effect of ethanol on proliferation and estrogen receptor-alpha expression in human breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett 165:131–7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  44. Fan S, Meng Q, Gao B, et al. (2000) Alcohol stimulates estrogen receptor signaling in human breast cancer cell lines. Cancer Res 60:5635–9.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  45. Reichman ME, Judd JT, Longcope C, et al. (1993) Effects of alcohol consumption on plasma and urinary hormone concentrations in premenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:722–7.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  46. Garro AJ and Lieber CS. (1990) Alcohol and cancer. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 30:219–49.
  47. Weir DG, McGing PG, Scott JM. (1985) Folate metabolism, the enterohepatic circulation and alcohol. Biochem Pharmacol 34:1–7.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  48. Colditz GA, Stampfer MJ, Willett WC, et al. (1990) Prospective study of estrogen replacement therapy and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. JAMA 264:2648–53.[Abstract]
  49. Gapstur SM, Potter JD, Sellers TA, et al. (1992) Increased risk of breast cancer with alcohol consumption in postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 136:1221–31.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  50. Maskarinec G, Takata Y, Pagano I, et al. (2006) Alcohol consumption and mammographic density in a multiethnic population. Int J Cancer 118:2579–83.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]
  51. DerSimonian R and Laird N. (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7:177–88.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline]

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
D. Grady, J. A. Cauley, M. J. Geiger, M. Kornitzer, L. Mosca, P. Collins, N. K. Wenger, J. Song, J. Mershon, E. Barrett-Connor, et al.
Reduced Incidence of Invasive Breast Cancer With Raloxifene Among Women at Increased Coronary Risk
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 18, 2008; 100(12): 854 - 861.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. M. Zhang, J. Lin, N. R. Cook, I-M. Lee, J. E. Manson, J. E. Buring, and P. M. Ridker
C-Reactive Protein and Risk of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 6, 2007; 99(11): 890 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
165/6/667    most recent
kwk054v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buring, J. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zhang, S. M.
Right arrow Articles by Buring, J. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?