American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 153, No. 11 : 1048-1049
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS |
Bertazzi et al. Respond to Smith and Lopipero
1 Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, EPOCA, Research Center for Occupational, Clinical and Environmental Epidemiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
2 Unit of Epidemiology, Department of Occupational Health and Safety, Istituti Clinici di Perfezionamento, Milan, Italy.
3 Regional Epidemiological Office, Health Directorate, Regione Lombardia, Milan, Italy.
Abbreviations: TCDD, 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin
 |
INTRODUCTION |
|---|
 TOP INTRODUCTION REFERENCES |
|---|
We thank Smith and Lopipero for their invited commentary (1
), which we found appropriate and useful for interpreting the latest Seveso, Italy, findings (2). Human exposure to 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) is widespread (3). Epidemiologic studies are essential to assessing the risk linked to the environmental contamination, and consistency in the findings enhances confidence in their results.
It is not surprising that, on average, exposure to TCDD in Seveso was lower than in occupational cohorts. In the former case, the chemical release was limited in time, and its content eventually was diluted over an extended outdoor area (4). Still, the average TCDD blood concentration in the Seveso population was two orders of magnitude higher than the reported background environmental level (1). Thus, the finding of increased cancer mortality cannot be considered totally unexpected. An increase in all-cancer and lung cancer mortality, consistent with what was observed in occupational cohorts, was found in men in zones A and B after 15 years. Smith and Lopipero (1) suggest that smoking might be the actual explanation. This is a possibility, and we intend to further explore smoking habits in our index and referent populations.
However, if the increased risk was due to smoking, one would expect high rate ratios for the whole study period, not only 15–20 years since dioxin exposure. With regard to concomitant potentially smoking-related findings, several other studies linked increased cardiovascular mortality to dioxin exposure, sometimes with a dose-related pattern (5–7) and use of internal reference groups (6, 7), thus leaving little room for confounding arguments. In addition, other smoking-related cancers (e.g., larynx, esophagus, pancreas, and bladder) were not elevated in Seveso males after 15 years (2). To be a confounder, smoking should be distributed unevenly among zones. Independent surveys assessed smoking habits in 1986–1987 in random samples of the population of Desio (352 subjects), one of the cities affected by the Seveso accident, and in the population in a nearby district outside the study area (466 subjects), quite similar to our reference population. Distribution of the subjects by smoking category in the two samples was as follows: never smokers, 76 (22 percent) in Desio versus 104 (22 percent) in the outside area; former smokers, 107 (30 percent) versus 154 (33 percent); current smokers of <10 cigarettes/day, 30 (9 percent) versus 38 (8 percent); current smokers of 10–20 cigarettes/day, 99 (28 percent) versus 134 (29 percent); and current smokers of >20 cigarettes/day, 40 (11 percent) versus 36 (8 percent) (8).This, although limited, set of data suggests that geographic variation in smoking habits might be negligible across subareas in the region including the accidentally contaminated territory.
Although we admit that with so many data "there is a little bit of something for everybody" (1, p. 1046), results for lymphatic and hemopoietic neoplasms clearly do stand out. The pattern suggests a systematic difference in mortality from these causes between the TCDD-exposed and the local reference population. Cancer incidence data for the first postaccident period support these findings (9). The non-Hodgkin's lymphoma increase became significant after 15 years (five observed; rate ratio = 2.8, 95 percent confidence interval: 1,1, 7.0). An increased occurrence of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma also has been observed in occupational cohorts (6, 10, 11).
On the basis of our interpretation, the 20-year mortality results do show that the Seveso population experienced, consistent with other exposed populations, a modest excess of all-cancer and respiratory cancer mortality long after initial exposure and a moderately increased occurrence of lymphatic and hematopoietic cancer. This pattern is different from what might have been expected on the basis of animal experiments. A limited number of persons probably had extremely high levels of exposure, and susceptibility factors might also have played a role.
|
NOTES |
|---|
Reprint requests to Dr. Pier Alberto Bertazzi, EPOCA, Epidemiology Research Center, Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Milan, 8 Via San Barnaba, 20122 Milano, Italy (e-mail: pieralberto.bertazzi{at}unimi.it).
|
REFERENCES |
|---|
|
TOPINTRODUCTIONREFERENCES |
|---|
-
Smith A, Lopipero P. Invited commentary: how do the Seveso findings affect conclusions concerning TCDD as a human carcinogen? Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:1045–7.
[Free Full Text] -
Bertazzi PA, Consonni D, Bachetti S, et al. Health effects of dioxin exposure: a 20-year mortality study. Am J Epidemiol 2001;153:1031–44.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Polychlorinated dibenzo-para dioxins and polychlorinated dibenzofurans. IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans. Vol 69. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer, 1997.
- di Domenico A, Silano V, Viviano G, et al. Accidental release of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) at Seveso, Italy. II. TCDD distribution in the soil surface layer. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 1980;4:298–320.[Web of Science][Medline]
-
Flesch-Janys D, Berger J, Gurn P, et al. Exposure to polychlorinated dioxins and furans (PCDD/F) and mortality in a cohort of workers from a herbicide-producing plant in Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany. Am J Epidemiol 1995;142:1165–75.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] -
Hooiveld M, Heederik DJ, Kogevinas M, et al. Second follow-up of a Dutch cohort occupationally exposed to phenoxy herbicides, chlorophenols, and contaminants. Am J Epidemiol 1998;147:891–901.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] -
Steenland K, Piacitelli L, Deddens J, et al. Cancer, heart disease, and diabetes in workers exposed to 2,3,7,8-TCDD. J Natl Cancer Inst 1999;91:779–86.
[Abstract/Free Full Text] - Cesana GC, De Vito G, Ferrario M, et al. Trends of smoking habits in northern Italy (1986–1990). Eur J Epidemiol 1995;11:251–8.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Bertazzi PA, Pesatori AC, Consonni D, et al. Cancer incidence in a population accidentally exposed to 2,3,7,8 tetrachlorodibenzo-para-dioxin. Epidemiology 1993;4:398–406.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Becher H, Flesch-Janys D, Kauppinen T, et al. Cancer mortality in German male workers exposed to phenoxy herbicides and dioxins. Cancer Causes Control 1996;7:312–21.[Web of Science][Medline]
- Kogevinas M, Kauppinen T, Winkelmann R, et al. Soft tissue sarcoma and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in workers exposed to chlorophenoxy herbicides, chlorophenols and dioxins: two nested case-control studies. Epidemiology 1995;6:396–402.[Web of Science][Medline]
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:
- Health Effects of Dioxin Exposure: A 20-Year Mortality Study
- Pier Alberto Bertazzi, Dario Consonni, Silvia Bachetti, Maurizia Rubagotti, Andrea Baccarelli, Carlo Zocchetti, and Angela C. Pesatori
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001 153: 1031-1044.[Abstract] [FREE Full Text] - Invited Commentary: How Do the Seveso Findings Affect Conclusions Concerning TCDD as a Human Carcinogen?
- Allan H. Smith and Peggy Lopipero
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001 153: 1045-1047.[Extract] [FREE Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. Consonni, A. C. Pesatori, C. Zocchetti, R. Sindaco, L. C. D'Oro, M. Rubagotti, and P. A. Bertazzi Mortality in a Population Exposed to Dioxin after the Seveso, Italy, Accident in 1976: 25 Years of Follow-Up Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 167(7): 847 - 858. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. B. Starr Significant Shortcomings of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Latest Draft Risk Characterization for Dioxin-Like Compounds Toxicol. Sci., November 1, 2001; 64(1): 7 - 13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||