Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on January 29, 2008
American Journal of Epidemiology 2008 167(5):530-531; doi:10.1093/aje/kwm358
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
167/5/530    most recent
kwm358v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pischon, T.
Right arrow Articles by Boeing, H.
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Pischon, T.
Right arrow Articles by Boeing, H.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2008. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Pischon et al. Respond to "Variable Selection versus Shrinkage in Control of Confounders"

Tobias Pischon, Matthias B. Schulze, Dagmar Drogan and Heiner Boeing

From the Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany

Correspondence to Dr. Tobias Pischon, Department of Epidemiology, German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Arthur-Scheunert-Allee 114–116, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany (e-mail: pischon@dife.de).

Received for publication October 24, 2007. Accepted for publication November 7, 2007.

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

We read with great interest Dr. Greenland's invited commentary (1) about variable selection to control for confounding in observational studies. We agree with Dr. Greenland that the identification of confounders should be based primarily on background knowledge and not on significance testing. However, our proposed method (2) is not meant primarily as . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:

A Statistical Test for the Equality of Differently Adjusted Incidence Rate Ratios
Kurt Hoffmann, Tobias Pischon, Mandy Schulz, Matthias B. Schulze, Jennifer Ray, and Heiner Boeing
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2008 167: 517-522. [Abstract] [Full Text]