Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on December 8, 2006
American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165(4):475-476; doi:10.1093/aje/kwk102
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
165/4/475    most recent
kwk102v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Myer, L.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, T. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Myer, L.
Right arrow Articles by Wright, T. C., Jr.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

THE AUTHORS REPLY

Landon Myer1,2, Louise Kuhn2,3, Lynette Denny4 and Thomas C. Wright, Jr.5

1 Infectious Diseases Epidemiology Unit, School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
2 Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY 10027
3 Sergievsky Center, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032
4 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
5 Department of Pathology, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY 10032

(e-mail: lmyer@cormack.uct.ac.za)

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

We appreciate the interest of McClelland et al. (1) in our recent analysis suggesting no association between women's intravaginal practices and incident human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection (2).

Although a number of cross-sectional studies have suggested that intravaginal practices are associated with prevalent HIV infection, few data from prospective studies support an association with incident HIV (3). In addition to our study, van de Wijgert et al. (4) recently reported . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?