Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on September 6, 2006
American Journal of Epidemiology 2006 164(11):1052-1055; doi:10.1093/aje/kwj301
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
164/11/1052    most recent
kwj301v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howards, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hertz-Picciotto, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howards, P. P.
Right arrow Articles by Hertz-Picciotto, I.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

Invited Commentary

Invited Commentary: Disinfection By-Products and Pregnancy Loss—Lessons

Penelope P. Howards1 and Irva Hertz-Picciotto2

1 Division of Epidemiology, Statistics, and Prevention Research, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda, MD
2 Department of Public Health Sciences, Divisions of Environmental and Occupational Health and of Epidemiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA

Correspondence to Dr. Irva Hertz-Picciotto, Department of Public Health Sciences, TB #168, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616 (e-mail: ihp@ucdavis.edu).

Received for publication June 19, 2006. Accepted for publication June 21, 2006.

Abbreviations: BDCM, bromodichloromethane; DBP, disinfection by-product; THM, trihalomethane

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Chlorine was first used to purify water in the United States almost 100 years ago (1). Since that time, the technique has been improved upon and its use expanded so that most water systems today are disinfected (1). In 1995, approximately 64 percent of community water systems (systems that provide water to the same people year-round) specifically added chlorine as a disinfectant, and the remaining systems commonly added chloramine, according to an Environmental Protection Agency survey (1). Disinfection protects against waterborne pathogens, but chlorine reacts with organic matter in the water to form both halogenated and nonhalogenated disinfection by-products (DBPs), including trihalomethanes (THMs) (2). The Environmental Protection Agency set standards for total THM levels in community water systems after the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974 was implemented (1). As a result, exposure to THMs is generally at levels currently . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:

Exposure to Drinking Water Disinfection By-Products and Pregnancy Loss
David A. Savitz, Philip C. Singer, Amy H. Herring, Katherine E. Hartmann, Howard S. Weinberg, and Christina Makarushka
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2006 164: 1043-1051. [Abstract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Reproductive SciencesHome page
K. P. Stillerman, D. R. Mattison, L. C. Giudice, and T. J. Woodruff
Environmental Exposures and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes: A Review of the Science
Reproductive Sciences, September 1, 2008; 15(7): 631 - 650.
[Abstract] [PDF]