American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on February 22, 2006
American Journal of Epidemiology 2006 163(8):780-781; doi:10.1093/aje/kwj107
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.
Letter to the Editor |
THE AUTHORS REPLY
Department of Economics, University of Colorado at Denver, Denver, CO 80217-3364
(e-mail: drees@carbon.cudenver.edu)
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
In their letter to the editor, Goodman and Capitman (1
) take issue with our characterization (2
) of their research. Whenever we discuss the work of others, we hope to get it right. In this case, we believe that a dispassionate reader will find Goodman and Capitman's complaints to be unjustified.
Goodman and Capitman (1
) begin by taking issue with the word "inappropriate," claiming that we used this word to describe their carefully conceived analytic strategy. What we wrote was, "if one is interested in ruling out the possibility that depression affects whether a teen takes
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Duncan and D. I. Rees THE AUTHORS REPLY Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2006; 163(8): 780 - 781. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
