American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on September 8, 2005
American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 162(9):919-920; doi:10.1093/aje/kwi288
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2005 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.
Letter to the Editor |
THE AUTHORS REPLY
Department of Research, Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, MN 55904
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
The letter from Dr. Sheikh (1
) about our article (2
) raises some interesting issues that are important to address. The kappa statistic is most clearly useful when a single item is being evaluated, the number of
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
T. L. Lash, M. P. Fox, S. S. Thwin, A. M. Geiger, D. S. M. Buist, F. Wei, T. S. Field, M. U. Yood, F. J. Frost, V. P. Quinn, et al. Using Probabilistic Corrections to Account for Abstractor Agreement in Medical Record Reviews Am. J. Epidemiol., June 15, 2007; 165(12): 1454 - 1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. P. Yawn and P. M. Wollan THE AUTHORS REPLY Am. J. Epidemiol., November 1, 2005; 162(9): 919 - 920. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
