Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2005
American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 162(2):196; doi:10.1093/aje/kwi177
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
162/2/196    most recent
kwi177v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bacchetti, P.
Right arrow Articles by McCulloch, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bacchetti, P.
Right arrow Articles by McCulloch, C. E.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2005 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

THE AUTHORS REPLY

Peter Bacchetti1, Leslie E. Wolf2, Mark R. Segal1 and Charles E. McCulloch1

1 Division of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0560
2 Program in Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143-0560

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

We thank Halpern et al. (1Go) for responding to our paper in the Journal (2Go). We appreciate this opportunity to emphasize key points concerning the per-participant formulation, altruistic satisfaction, and the scope of our paper.

Halpern et al. in fact reassert the very premises we used to show that the argument for condemning low-power studies fails on its own terms. They propose . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?