Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on October 5, 2005
American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 162(10):1032-1033; doi:10.1093/aje/kwi314
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
162/10/1032-a    most recent
kwi314v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by von Elm, E.
Right arrow Articles by Egger, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by von Elm, E.
Right arrow Articles by Egger, M.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2005 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

Letter to the Editor

RE: "QUALITY OF REPORTING OF OBSERVATIONAL LONGITUDINAL RESEARCH"

Erik von Elm1, Douglas G. Altman2, Stuart Pocock3, Jan P. Vandenbroucke4 and Matthias Egger1

1 Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland
2 Cancer Research UK/NHS Centre for Statistics in Medicine, Oxford OX3 7LF, United Kingdom
3 London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London WC1E 7HT, United Kingdom
4 Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Hospital, 2300 RC Leiden, The Netherlands

vonelm@ispm.unibe.ch

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

We read the Journal article by Tooth et al. (1Go) with great interest. The authors propose a checklist to assist authors reporting observational longitudinal studies. Clearly, there is a need to improve the reporting of observational research . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Tooth, R. Ware, C. Bain, D. Purdie, and A. Dobson
THE AUTHORS REPLY
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2005; 162(10): 1033 - 1033.
[Full Text] [PDF]