Copyright © 2005 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
SPECIAL ARTICLE |
Bacchetti et al. Respond to "Ethics and Sample SizeAnother View"
1 Division of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
2 Program in Medical Ethics, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA.
Received for publication September 22, 2004; accepted for publication October 14, 2004.
| The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below. |
We thank Dr. Prentice (1) for taking the time to respond to our article (2). We explain here why we do not believe that he has provided a meaningful challenge to our argument. We see possible objections related to unappealing implications, use of power to measure value, implications for series of trials, how value per participant is calculated, and participants
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:
- Ethics and Sample Size
- Peter Bacchetti, Leslie E. Wolf, Mark R. Segal, and Charles E. McCulloch
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2005 161: 105-110.[Abstract] [FREE Full Text]
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Bacchetti, L. E. Wolf, M. R. Segal, and C. E. McCulloch THE AUTHORS REPLY Am. J. Epidemiol., July 15, 2005; 162(2): 196 - 196. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
