Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S.
Right arrow Articles by Poulton, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Williams, S.
Right arrow Articles by Poulton, R.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:666.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

THE AUTHORS REPLY

Sheila Williams and Richie Poulton

Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand

The first 10% of the full text of this article appears below.

In their letter, Rich-Edwards et al. (1) say that we misinterpreted our estimate for birth weight. They are right in stating that the parameter was –0.96 mmHg (95 percent confidence interval: –1.38, –0,54) for a 1 kg increase in birth weight (2). However, because the model included both later weight and birth weight, the effect . . . [Full Text of this Article]


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?