Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (27)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Willett, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Willett, W.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 154, No. 12 : 1100-1102
Copyright © 2001 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


NUTRITIONAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

Invited Commentary: A Further Look at Dietary Questionnaire Validation

Walter Willett

From the Departments of Nutrition and Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, and from the Channing Laboratory, Departments of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (e-mail: dosulliv@hsph.harvard.edu).

Knowledge about the long-term consequences of diet is centrally dependent on the methods used to measure the intake of foods by individual participants in epidemiologic studies. To avoid recall and selection biases, which occur in many case-control investigations of diet, large-scale prospective studies are highly desirable. In this context, self-administered questionnaires are usually a practical necessity, and several different self-administered food frequency questionnaires have been developed. Because of the complex nature of individual diets and the substantial variability of food intake over time, measurement errors are inevitable. Thus, the evaluation and refinement of dietary questionnaires are appropriately an important component of nutritional epidemiology. The paper by Subar et al. (1Go) in this issue is a valuable contribution, as it provides further insights into progress in the development of dietary assessment methods as well as limitations in the methods to assess validity.

In the analysis by Subar et al. (1Go. . . [Full Text of this Article]

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

NOTES

REFERENCES


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?

Related articles in Am. J. Epidemiol.:

Invited Commentary: Another Perspective on Food Frequency Questionnaires
Gladys Block
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001 154: 1103-1104. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  

Subar et al. Respond to "A Further Look at Dietary Questionnaire Validation" and "Another Perspective on Food Frequency Questionnaires"
Amy F. Subar, Frances E. Thompson, and Victor Kipnis
Am. J. Epidemiol. 2001 154: 1105-1106. [Extract] [FREE Full Text]  



This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
U. Nothlings, K. Hoffmann, M. M. Bergmann, and H. Boeing
Fitting Portion Sizes in a Self-Administered Food Frequency Questionnaire
J. Nutr., December 1, 2007; 137(12): 2781 - 2786.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
S.-C. Chang, R. G. Ziegler, B. Dunn, R. Stolzenberg-Solomon, J. V. Lacey Jr., W.-Y. Huang, A. Schatzkin, D. Reding, R. N. Hoover, P. Hartge, et al.
Association of energy intake and energy balance with postmenopausal breast cancer in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2006; 15(2): 334 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Satia-Abouta, J. A. Galanko, J. D. Potter, A. Ammerman, C. F. Martin, and R. S. Sandler
Associations of Total Energy and Macronutrients with Colon Cancer Risk in African Americans and Whites: Results from the North Carolina Colon Cancer Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 15, 2003; 158(10): 951 - 962.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C. A. Thomson, A. Giuliano, C. L. Rock, C. K. Ritenbaugh, S. W. Flatt, S. Faerber, V. Newman, B. Caan, E. Graver, V. Hartz, et al.
Measuring Dietary Change in a Diet Intervention Trial: Comparing Food Frequency Questionnaire and Dietary Recalls
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 15, 2003; 157(8): 754 - 762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
U. Noethlings, K. Hoffmann, M. M. Bergmann, and H. Boeing
Portion Size Adds Limited Information on Variance in Food Intake of Participants in the EPIC-Potsdam Study
J. Nutr., February 1, 2003; 133(2): 510 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. Byers
Food Frequency Dietary Assessment: How Bad Is Good Enough?
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2001; 154(12): 1087 - 1088.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. F. Subar, F. E. Thompson, and V. Kipnis
Subar et al. Respond to "A Further Look at Dietary Questionnaire Validation" and "Another Perspective on Food Frequency Questionnaires"
Am. J. Epidemiol., December 15, 2001; 154(12): 1105 - 1106.
[Full Text] [PDF]