Skip Navigation



American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access published online on December 22, 2008

American Journal of Epidemiology, doi:10.1093/aje/kwn369
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Material
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
169/5/554    most recent
kwn369v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schootman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Aft, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schootman, M.
Right arrow Articles by Aft, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2008. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Original Contribution

The Role of Poverty Rate and Racial Distribution in the Geographic Clustering of Breast Cancer Survival Among Older Women: A Geographic and Multilevel Analysis

Mario Schootman, Donna B. Jeffe, Min Lian, William E. Gillanders and Rebecca Aft

Correspondence to Dr. Mario Schootman, Campus Box 8504, Division of Health Behavior Research, Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, Washington University School of Medicine, 4444 Forest Park Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63108 (e-mail: mschootm{at}dom.wustl.edu).

Received for publication December 18, 2007. Accepted for publication October 21, 2008.

The authors examined disparities in survival among women aged 66 years or older in association with census-tract-level poverty rate, racial distribution, and individual-level factors, including patient-, treatment-, and tumor-related factors, utilization of medical care, and mammography use. They used linked data from the 1992–1999 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) programs, 1991–1999 Medicare claims, and the 1990 US Census. A geographic information system and advanced statistics identified areas of increased or reduced breast cancer survival and possible reasons for geographic variation in survival in 2 of the 5 SEER areas studied. In the Detroit, Michigan, area, one geographic cluster of shorter-than-expected breast cancer survival was identified (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.60). An additional area where survival was longer than expected approached statistical significance (HR = 0.4; P = 0.056). In the Atlanta, Georgia, area, one cluster of shorter- (HR = 1.81) and one cluster of longer-than-expected (HR = 0.72) breast cancer survival were identified. Stage at diagnosis and census-tract poverty (and patient's race in Atlanta) explained the geographic variation in breast cancer survival. No geographic clusters were identified in the 3 other SEER programs. Interventions to reduce late-stage breast cancer, focusing on areas of high poverty and targeting African Americans, may reduce disparities in breast cancer survival in the Detroit and Atlanta areas.

breast neoplasms; cluster analysis; geography; population groups; poverty; survival

Abbreviations: ACSH, ambulatory-care–sensitive hospitalization(s); CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification; SEER, Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.