Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on May 13, 2008
American Journal of Epidemiology 2008 168(1):89-97; doi:10.1093/aje/kwn099
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
168/1/89    most recent
kwn099v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Janes, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pepe, M. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Janes, H.
Right arrow Articles by Pepe, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2008. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Adjusting for Covariates in Studies of Diagnostic, Screening, or Prognostic Markers: An Old Concept in a New Setting

Holly Janes1 and Margaret S. Pepe1,2

1 Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
2 Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA

Correspondence to Dr. Holly Janes, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Avenue North, M2-C200, Seattle, WA 98109 (e-mail: hjanes{at}scharp.org)

Received for publication May 4, 2007. Accepted for publication March 21, 2008.

The concept of covariate adjustment is well established in therapeutic and etiologic studies. However, it has received little attention in the growing area of medical research devoted to the development of markers for disease diagnosis, screening, or prognosis, where classification accuracy, rather than association, is of primary interest. In this paper, the authors demonstrate the need for covariate adjustment in studies of classification accuracy, discuss methods for adjusting for covariates, and distinguish covariate adjustment from several other related, but fundamentally different, uses for covariates. They draw analogies and contrasts throughout with studies of association.

covariance adjustment; ROC curve; sensitivity; specificity

Abbreviations: AROC, covariate-adjusted ROC curve; PSA, prostate-specific antigen; ROC, receiver operating characteristic


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.