Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FOGEL, A.
Right arrow Articles by GERICHTER, CH. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by FOGEL, A.
Right arrow Articles by GERICHTER, CH. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 93, No. 5: 392-398
Copyright © 1971 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health


other

COMPARATIVE TRIALS OF RA 27/3 AND CENDEHILL RUBELLA VACCINES IN ADULT AND ADOLESCENT FEMALES1

A. FOGEL2, A. MOSHKOWITZ3, L. RANNON2 and CH. B. GERICHTER2

2Virus Laboratory, Ministry of Health Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel
3Department of Pediatrics B, Bikur-Holim General Hospital Jerusalem, Israel

Fogel, A. (Virus Lab., Ministry of Health, Tel Aviv-Jaffa, Israel), A. Moshkowitz, L Rannon and Ch. B. Gerichter. Comparative trials of RA 27/3 and Cendehill rubella vaccines in adult and adolescent females. Amer J Epidem 93: 392–398, 1971.—Two rubella vaccines, RA 27/3 and Cendehill, were compared with respect to their immunogenicity and side effects in a group of 259 adult female volunteers. The clinical reactions observed were in general mild and not disturbing for the vac-cinees, the most frequent side effect being lymphadenopathy. Mild joint symptoms occurred in some vaccinees over 22 years old given RA 27/3 vaccine intranasally and almost exclusively among those vaccinated during winter months. Some of the vaccinees excreted the vaccine virus, but no spread to close family contacts was observed. The antibody response was more rapid following vaccination with RA 27/3 as compared to Cendehill vaccine, the former giving a higher percentage of neutralizing antibodies as well as higher geometric mean titers of HI antibodies early following vaccination. At 7 months after the immunization practically no differences were found in the persistence of antibodies in both groups. One year following vaccination with RA 27/3 vaccine all 20 persons tested had neutralizing antibodies as well as high titers of HI antibodies.

antibodies; immunization; rubella; vaccines


1This investigation was supported by a grant from Smith, Kline, and French Laboratories, Philadelphia, Pa.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JAMAHome page
W. A. Orenstein, P. N. R. Heseltine, S. J. LeGagnoux, and B. Portnoy
Rubella Vaccine and Susceptible Hospital Employees: Poor Physician Participation
JAMA, February 20, 1981; 245(7): 711 - 713.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
S. A. Plotkin, J. D. Farquhar, and P. L. Ogra
Immunologic Properties of RA27/3 Rubella Virus Vaccine: A Comparison With Strains Presently Licensed in the United States
JAMA, August 6, 1973; 225(6): 585 - 590.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
R. E. Weibel, J. Stokes Jr., E. B. Buynak, and M. R. Hilleman
Influence of Age on Clinical Response to HPV-77 Duck Rubella Vaccine
JAMA, November 13, 1972; 222(7): 805 - 807.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Pediatr Adolesc MedHome page
R. B. Wallace and P. Isacson
Comparative Trial of HPV-77, DE-5 and RA 27/3 Live-Attenuated Rubella Vaccines
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, October 1, 1972; 124(4): 536 - 538.
[Abstract] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.