American Journal of Epidemiology Vol. 91, No. 4: 378-392
Copyright © 1970 by The Johns Hopkins University School of Hygiene and Public Health
other |
NEW HAVEN SURVEY OF JOINT DISEASES. XI: OBSERVER VARIABILITY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF X-RAYS FOR OSTEOARTHROSIS OF THE HANDS1,2,3
Wright, E. C. and R. M. Acheson (Dept. Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale Univ. School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. 06510). New Haven survey of joint diseases. Xl: Observer variability in the assessment of x-rays for osteoarthrosis of the hands. Amer. J. Epid., 1970, 97: 378–392.—-X-rays of the hand from the New Haven survey of joint diseases were read independently by three observers, two of whom also read a set of films twice. There were considerable differences between the readings of the three observers: the percentage of diseased joints varied from 6% to 15% and all three readers agreed on only 68% of the joints. (The pairwise agreements were 74%, 70% and 87%). The replicate readings of the two observers who read the films twice showed less variability. The reader upon whose readings the survey results are based considered 18.8% of the joints to be diseased the first time and 18.2% the second time. His second reading agreed with his first in 80% of the joints and was within one grade of his first reading in 98% of the joints. It was found that the agreement of the observers depended on the proportion of normal joints in the sample and on the frequency with which each observer detected very early disease. An analysis of the agreement between observers for each grade showed that the grade 1 (doubtful disease) caused the most difficulty, with the grades 2 (minimal) and 3 (moderate) causing more difficulty than either 0 (normal) or 4 (severe). It was felt that the reliance of the grading system on several parallel but independent manifestations of the disease might contribute to this disagreement.
diagnosis; hand; joint diseases; observer variability; osteoarthrosis; radiography; x-ray, diagnostic
1From the Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Conn. 06610. Reprint requests to Dr. Acheson.
2This study was supported by grants from the following sources: USPHS Grant CH-07-11 and contract SAR/PH-86-63-153 Division of Diabetes and Arthritis, National Center for Chronic Disease Control, USPHS: United Health Foundations, New York and New Haven Foundation.
3The authors acknowledge with gratitude the immense time and effort of the three assessors: Dr. Arthur R. Clemett, St. Vincent's Hospital, New York, N. Y.; Dr. John R. Lawrence, Empire Rheumatism Council, Manchester, England and Dr. W. M. O'Brien, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Richmond, Va.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  P. Jen, B. Woo, P. E. Rosenthal, H. F. Bunn, A. Loscalzo, and L. Goldman The Value of the Peripheral Blood Smear in Anemic Inpatients: The Laboratory's Reading v a Physician's Reading Arch Intern Med, June 1, 1983; 143(6): 1120 - 1125. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|