Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on September 9, 2009
American Journal of Epidemiology 2009 170(7):918-924; doi:10.1093/aje/kwp219
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
170/7/918    most recent
kwp219v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Minnis, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Padian, N. S.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Minnis, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Padian, N. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2009. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Biomarker Validation of Reports of Recent Sexual Activity: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study in Zimbabwe

Alexandra M. Minnis, Markus J. Steiner, Maria F. Gallo, Lee Warner, Marcia M. Hobbs, Ariane van der Straten, Tsungai Chipato, Maurizio Macaluso and Nancy S. Padian

Correspondence to Dr. Alexandra Minnis, Women's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, 114 Sansome Street, Suite 500, San Francisco, CA 94104 (e-mail: aminnis{at}rti.org).

Received for publication April 10, 2009. Accepted for publication June 25, 2009.

Challenges in the accurate measurement of sexual behavior in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention research are well documented and have prompted discussion about whether valid assessments are possible. Audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) may increase the validity of self-reported behavioral data. In 2006–2007, Zimbabwean women participated in a randomized, cross-sectional study that compared self-reports of recent vaginal sex and condom use collected through ACASI or face-to-face interviewing (FTFI) with a validated objective biomarker of recent semen exposure (prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels). Of 910 study participants, 196 (21.5%) tested positive for PSA, an indication of semen exposure during the previous 2 days. Of these 196 participants, 23 (11.7%) reported no sex in the previous 2 days, with no difference in reported sexual activity between interview modes (12.5% ACASI vs. 10.9% FTFI; Fisher's exact test: P = 0.72). In addition, 71 PSA-positive participants (36.2%) reported condom-protected vaginal sex only; their reports also indicated no difference between interview modes (33.7% ACASI vs. 39.1% FTFI; P = 0.26). Only 52% of PSA-positive participants reported unprotected sex during the previous 2 days. Self-report was a poor predictor of recent sexual activity and condom use in this study, regardless of interview mode, providing evidence that such data should be interpreted cautiously.

biological markers; condoms; data collection; epidemiologic measurements; HIV; prostate-specific antigen; sexual behavior


Abbreviations: ACASI, audio computer-assisted self-interviewing; FTFI, face-to-face interviewing; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus; MIRA, Methods for Improving Reproductive Health in Africa; PSA, prostate-specific antigen


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.