Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on May 8, 2009
American Journal of Epidemiology 2009 170(1):37-45; doi:10.1093/aje/kwp096
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Online Supplement
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
170/1/37    most recent
kwp096v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Imamura, F.
Right arrow Articles by Jacques, P. F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Imamura, F.
Right arrow Articles by Jacques, P. F.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2009. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Confounding by Dietary Patterns of the Inverse Association Between Alcohol Consumption and Type 2 Diabetes Risk

Fumiaki Imamura, Alice H. Lichtenstein, Gerard E. Dallal, James B. Meigs and Paul F. Jacques

Correspondence to Dr. Paul F. Jacques, Jean Mayer US Department of Agriculture Human Nutrition Research Center on Aging, 711 Washington Street, Boston, MA 02111 (e-mail: paul.jacques{at}tufts.edu).

Received for publication November 14, 2008. Accepted for publication March 25, 2009.

The ability to interpret epidemiologic observations is limited because of potential residual confounding by correlated dietary components. Dietary pattern analyses by factor analysis or partial least squares may overcome the limitation. To examine confounding by dietary pattern as well as standard risk factors and selected nutrients, the authors modeled the longitudinal association between alcohol consumption and 7-year risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus in 2,879 healthy adults enrolled in the Framingham Offspring Study (1991–2001) by Cox proportional hazard models. After adjustment for standard risk factors, consumers of ≥9.0 drinks/week had a significantly lower risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus compared with abstainers (hazard ratio = 0.47, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.27, 0.81). Adjustment for selected nutrients had little effect on the hazard ratio, whereas adjustment for dietary pattern variables by factor analysis significantly shifted the hazard ratio away from null (hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.17, 0.64) by 40.0% (95% CI: 16.8, 57.0; P = 0.002). Dietary pattern variables by partial least squares showed similar results. Therefore, the observed inverse association, consistent with past studies, was confounded by dietary patterns, and this confounding was not captured by individual nutrient adjustment. The data suggest that alcohol intake, not dietary patterns associated with alcohol intake, is responsible for the observed inverse association with type 2 diabetes mellitus risk.

alcohol drinking; bias (epidemiology); confounding factors (epidemiology); diabetes mellitus, type 2; diet; factor analysis, statistical; least-squares analysis; proportional hazards models


Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HRadj, hazard ratio adjusted for potential confounders; HRunadj, hazard ratio unadjusted for potential confounders


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
F. Imamura, A. H Lichtenstein, G. E Dallal, J. B Meigs, and P. F Jacques
Generalizability of dietary patterns associated with incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2009; 90(4): 1075 - 1083.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.