Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on June 4, 2008
American Journal of Epidemiology 2008 168(3):261-267; doi:10.1093/aje/kwn133
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
168/3/261    most recent
kwn133v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bertelsen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bertelsen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Olsen, J. H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2008. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Benign Breast Disease among First-Degree Relatives of Young Breast Cancer Patients

Lisbeth Bertelsen1, Lene Mellemkjær1, Eva Balslev2 and Jørgen H. Olsen1

1 Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Copenhagen, Denmark
2 Pathology Department, Herlev Hospital, Herlev, Denmark

Correspondence to Lisbeth Bertelsen, Institute of Cancer Epidemiology, Danish Cancer Society, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark (e-mail: lisbethb{at}cancer.dk).

Received for publication January 9, 2008. Accepted for publication April 22, 2008.

Benign breast disease is associated with increased risk of breast cancer. To further clarify whether there is a genetic link between benign and malignant breast lesions, the authors identified 14,648 first-degree female relatives of 8,807 patients in whom breast cancer was diagnosed at <50 years of age by using Danish nationwide cancer and population registers. Hospital register data were used to follow the relatives for occurrence of benign breast disease from 1977 to 2003 and to calculate rates of benign breast disease in the general population of Danish women for comparison. Risk for relatives was increased for benign breast diseases (observed/expected ratio = 1.54, 95% confidence interval: 1.42, 1.66), particularly for relatives aged <40 years. Higher risks were observed after breast cancer had been diagnosed in the family; however, an increased risk for relatives aged <50 years (observed/expected ratio = 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.02, 1.51) was present before breast cancer was diagnosed in the family. Enhanced surveillance of close relatives of breast cancer patients seems to be an important factor to address when investigating the association between benign breast disease and familial breast cancer. A genetic link between benign breast disease and breast cancer was indicated by our data but needs to be confirmed in future studies.

breast diseases; breast neoplasms; Denmark; family; linkage (genetics); registries; women


Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ICD, International Classification of Diseases; O/E, observed/expected


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
T. J. Jorgensen, K. J. Helzlsouer, S. C. Clipp, J. H. Bolton, R. M. Crum, and K. Visvanathan
DNA Repair Gene Variants Associated with Benign Breast Disease in High Cancer Risk Women
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., January 1, 2009; 18(1): 346 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.