Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on September 4, 2007
American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 166(11):1306-1311; doi:10.1093/aje/kwm221
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
166/11/1306    most recent
kwm221v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brunner Huber, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Toth, J. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brunner Huber, L. R.
Right arrow Articles by Toth, J. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology © The Author 2007. Published by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Obesity and Oral Contraceptive Failure: Findings from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth

Larissa R. Brunner Huber and Jessica L. Toth

From the Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Charlotte, NC

Correspondence to Dr. Larissa R. Brunner Huber, The University of North Carolina at Charlotte, Department of Public Health Sciences, 9201 University City Boulevard, Charlotte, NC 28223-0001 (e-mail: lrhuber{at}uncc.edu).

Received for publication December 16, 2006. Accepted for publication June 29, 2007.

Oral contraceptives are the most popular reversible method of contraception in the United States. Although most women using oral contraceptives are reliably protected against pregnancy, nearly half of the 3 million unintended pregnancies in the United States annually occur among the 90% of women who use contraception. Recent findings suggest that obesity may reduce the biologic effectiveness of oral contraceptives. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the potential obesity–oral contraceptive failure association using 2002 National Survey of Family Growth data. In this retrospective cohort of 1,491 women, body mass index (kg/m2) was derived from self-reported values, and oral contraceptive failure was defined as conceptions that occurred while women used oral contraceptives. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals were obtained from Cox proportional hazards models. Obese women (body mass index ≥30 vs. 18.5–24.9) had an increased risk of oral contraceptive failure (hazard ratio = 1.59, 95% confidence interval: 0.94, 2.68). Results were largely attenuated after adjustment for age, race/ethnicity, and parity. This population-based study found no association between obesity and oral contraceptive failure. While it is possible that misclassification or uncontrolled confounding obscured a true relation, it may be that there is no association. Large, prospective studies are needed to assess whether obesity plays a biologically relevant role in oral contraceptive effectiveness.

contraceptives; oral; obesity; women's health


Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; NSFG, National Survey of Family Growth; OR, odds ratio


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
N. E Stotland
Obesity and pregnancy
BMJ, December 15, 2008; 337(dec15_1): a2450 - a2450.
[Full Text]


Home page
JWatch Women's HealthHome page
Obesity and Oral Contraceptive Failure: Still a Concern
Journal Watch Women's Health, February 7, 2008; 2008(207): 4 - 4.
[Full Text]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.