Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on April 9, 2007
American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 166(1):88-96; doi:10.1093/aje/kwm046
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
166/1/88    most recent
kwm046v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Macaluso, M.
Right arrow Articles by Duerr, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Macaluso, M.
Right arrow Articles by Duerr, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2007 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Efficacy of the Male Latex Condom and of the Female Polyurethane Condom as Barriers to Semen during Intercourse: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Maurizio Macaluso1, Richard Blackwell2, Denise J. Jamieson1, Andrzej Kulczycki3, Michael P. Chen1, Rachel Akers4, Dhong-jin Kim4 and Ann Duerr5

1 Division of Reproductive Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA
2 Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
3 Department of Maternal and Child Health, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
4 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL
5 HIV Vaccine Trials Network, Seattle, WA

Correspondence to Dr. Maurizio Macaluso, 4770 Buford Highway, NE, Mail Stop K-34, Atlanta, GA 30341-3717 (e-mail: mmacaluso{at}cdc.gov).

Received for publication August 8, 2006. Accepted for publication January 3, 2007.

In this 2000–2001 study, the authors compared the effectiveness of the male latex condom and the female polyurethane condom by assessing frequency and types of mechanical failure and by evaluating semen exposure during use. Eligible women from Birmingham, Alabama, were randomly assigned to begin the study with 10 male condoms and then switch to 10 female condoms (n = 55), or vice versa (n = 53), and were trained to use both types. Data collection included questionnaires for each condom use and measurement of prostate-specific antigen in specimens of vaginal fluid taken before and after intercourse. Participants returned 700 male condoms and 678 female condoms, and they reported mechanical problems for 9% and 34%, respectively. Moderate-high postcoital prostate-specific antigen levels (≥22 ng/ml) were detected in 3.5% of male condom uses and 4.5% of female condom uses (difference = 1%, 95% confidence interval: –1.6, 3.7). Moderate-high prostate-specific antigen values (≥22 ng/ml) were more frequent with mechanical problems (male condom, 9.6%; female condom, 9.4%) but less frequent with other problems (3.0% and 0.9%) or correct use with no problems (2.7% and 2.5%). This study indicates that although mechanical problems are more common with the female condom than with the male condom, these devices may involve a similar risk of semen exposure. Objectively assessed semen exposure is associated with self-reported mechanical problems.

clinical trials; condoms; condoms, female; contraception, barrier; prostate-specific antigen; treatment outcome


Abbreviations: PSA, prostate-specific antigen; STD, sexually transmitted disease


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. M. Minnis, M. J. Steiner, M. F. Gallo, L. Warner, M. M. Hobbs, A. van der Straten, T. Chipato, M. Macaluso, and N. S. Padian
Biomarker Validation of Reports of Recent Sexual Activity: Results of a Randomized Controlled Study in Zimbabwe
Am. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2009; 170(7): 918 - 924.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
L. Bahamondes, J. Diaz, N. M. Marchi, S. Castro, M. Villarroel, and M. Macaluso
Prostate-specific antigen in vaginal fluid after exposure to known amounts of semen and after condom use: comparison of self-collected and nurse-collected samples
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2008; 23(11): 2444 - 2451.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
L. Warner, D. R. Newman, M. L. Kamb, M. Fishbein, J. M. Douglas Jr, J. Zenilman, L. D'Anna, G. Bolan, J. Rogers, T. Peterman, et al.
Problems with Condom Use among Patients Attending Sexually Transmitted Disease Clinics: Prevalence, Predictors, and Relation to Incident Gonorrhea and Chlamydia
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2008; 167(3): 341 - 349.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.