Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on December 7, 2006
American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165(4):418-424; doi:10.1093/aje/kwk030
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
165/4/418    most recent
kwk030v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawlor, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Najman, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawlor, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Najman, J. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Epidemiologic Evidence for the Fetal Overnutrition Hypothesis: Findings from the Mater-University Study of Pregnancy and Its Outcomes

Debbie A. Lawlor1, George Davey Smith1, Michael O'Callaghan2, Rosa Alati3, Abdullah A. Mamun3, Gail M. Williams3 and Jake M. Najman3,4

1 Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
2 Child Development and Rehabilitation Services, Mater Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia
3 Longitudinal Studies Unit, School of Population Health, University of Queensland Medical School, Brisbane, Australia
4 School of Social Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

Correspondence to Prof. Debbie A. Lawlor, Department of Social Medicine, University of Bristol, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR, United Kingdom (e-mail: d.a.lawlor{at}bristol.ac.uk).

Received for publication April 17, 2006. Accepted for publication July 20, 2006.

The fetal overnutrition hypothesis proposes that greater maternal adiposity results in increased obesity throughout life in the offspring. The authors examined the associations between parental prepregnancy body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)2), based on height and weight reported by the mother at her first antenatal clinic visit, and offspring BMI (height and weight measured at age 14 years) in 3,340 parent-offspring trios from a birth cohort based in Brisbane, Australia (mothers were recruited in 1981–1984). The maternal-offspring BMI association was stronger than the paternal-offspring BMI association. In the fully adjusted model, the increase in standardized offspring BMI at age 14 for a one-standard-deviation (SD) increase in maternal BMI was 0.362 SD (95% confidence interval: 0.323, 0.402), and the corresponding result for a one-SD increase in paternal BMI was 0.239 SD (95% confidence interval: 0.197, 0.282). There was statistical support for a difference in the magnitude of the association between maternal-offspring BMI and paternal-offspring BMI in all confounder-adjusted models tested (all p's < 0.0001). In sensitivity analyses taking account of different plausible levels of nonpaternity (up to 15%), the greater maternal effect remained. These findings provide some support for the fetal overnutrition hypothesis.

body mass index; fetal development; fetal nutrition disorders


Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum Reprod UpdateHome page
S. M. Nelson, P. Matthews, and L. Poston
Maternal metabolism and obesity: modifiable determinants of pregnancy outcome
Hum. Reprod. Update, December 4, 2009; (2009) dmp050v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. A Lawlor, G. D. Smith, and M. Kivimaki
Reply to TJ Cole et al
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, May 1, 2008; 87(5): 1536 - 1537.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Kalliomaki, M. Carmen Collado, S. Salminen, and E. Isolauri
Early differences in fecal microbiota composition in children may predict overweight
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2008; 87(3): 534 - 538.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
M. Kivimaki, D. A Lawlor, G. D. Smith, M. Elovainio, M. Jokela, L. Keltikangas-Jarvinen, J. S. Viikari, and O. T Raitakari
Substantial intergenerational increases in body mass index are not explained by the fetal overnutrition hypothesis: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1509 - 1514.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. R. Gale, M. K. Javaid, S. M. Robinson, C. M. Law, K. M. Godfrey, and C. Cooper
Maternal Size in Pregnancy and Body Composition in Children
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 3904 - 3911.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
G. Davey Smith, C. Steer, S. Leary, and A. Ness
Is there an intrauterine influence on obesity? Evidence from parent child associations in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC)
Arch. Dis. Child., October 1, 2007; 92(10): 876 - 880.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
J. Julvez, N. Ribas-Fito, M. Torrent, M. Forns, R. Garcia-Esteban, and J. Sunyer
Maternal smoking habits and cognitive development of children at age 4 years in a population-based birth cohort
Int. J. Epidemiol., August 1, 2007; 36(4): 825 - 832.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.