Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on October 30, 2006
American Journal of Epidemiology 2007 165(3):302-308; doi:10.1093/aje/kwk007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
165/3/302    most recent
kwk007v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rudra, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Rudra, C. B.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2006 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved; printed in U.S.A.

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Weight Characteristics and Height in Relation to Risk of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus

Carole B. Rudra1,2, Tanya K. Sorensen3, Wendy M. Leisenring4, Edward Dashow3,5 and Michelle A. Williams1,2

1 Center for Perinatal Studies, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA
2 Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington School of Health and Community Medicine, Seattle, WA
3 Obstetrix Medical Group, Seattle, WA
4 Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA
5 Tacoma General Hospital, Southwest Washington Perinatal Services, Tacoma, WA

Correspondence to Dr. Carole B. Rudra, Center for Perinatal Studies, Swedish Medical Center, 1124 Columbia Street, Suite 750, Seattle, WA 98104 (e-mail: clb3{at}u.washington.edu).

Increasing prevalence of overweight and obesity motivated this prospective examination of gestational diabetes mellitus in relation to self-reported adult height, weight, and weight fluctuation. Gestational diabetes was assessed by use of medical records in 1,644 women enrolled in Seattle and Tacoma, Washington, between 1996 and 2002. After adjustment, risk was inversely related to height and directly related to pregravid body mass index (ptrend < 0.001). The relation with body mass index at age 18 years was J shaped, with higher risk among lean women (adjusted relative risk (RR) = 1.79, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01, 2.84) and obese women (RR = 4.53, 95% CI: 1.25, 16.43) versus normal-weight women. Weight gain between age 18 years and the study pregnancy was associated with increased risk independently of body mass index at 18 years and other confounders (≥10-kg gain vs. <2.5-kg change: RR = 3.43, 95% CI: 1.60, 7.37). Weight cycling (loss and regain of ≥6.8 kg) was not associated after adjustment for body mass index at 18 years and adult weight change (≥3 vs. zero cycles: RR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.56, 2.73). Cycling was nonsignificantly related among women who gained 10 kg or more during adulthood (≥3 vs. zero cycles: RR = 2.04, 95% CI: 0.83, 5.02). Efforts to prevent obesity and weight gain among young women may reduce gestational diabetes risk.

body mass index; body weight; diabetes, gestational; pregnancy; weight gain

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Am J EpidemiolHome page
M. E. Waring, C. B. Eaton, T. M. Lasater, and K. L. Lapane
Incident Diabetes in Relation to Weight Patterns During Middle Age
Am. J. Epidemiol., January 28, 2010; (2010): kwp433v1 - kwp433.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.