Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on August 24, 2005
American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 162(7):633-643; doi:10.1093/aje/kwi258
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
162/7/633    most recent
kwi258v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Emaus, N.
Right arrow Articles by Fønnebø, V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Emaus, N.
Right arrow Articles by Fønnebø, V.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2005 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Longitudinal Changes in Forearm Bone Mineral Density in Women and Men Aged 25–44 Years

The Tromsø Study: A Population-based Study

N. Emaus1, G. K. R. Berntsen1, R. M. Joakimsen2 and V. Fønnebø1

1 Institute of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
2 University Hospital of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway

Correspondence to Nina Emaus, Institute of Community Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Tromsø, NO-9037 Tromsø, Norway (e-mail: nina.emaus{at}ism.uit.no).

The aim of this study was to describe and compare bone mineral density (BMD) development in Norwegian women and men aged 25–44 years in a population-based, longitudinal study. BMD was measured twice at distal and ultradistal forearm sites by single x-ray absorptiometry in 258 women and 147 men (mean follow-up time, 6.4 (standard deviation, 0.6) years). At the distal site, a small annual gain of approximately 0.1% became a small loss beginning at age 34 years in men and age 36 years in women. At the ultradistal site, BMD change was predicted by age in women only, and bone loss started at age 38 years. A high degree of tracking of BMD measurements was observed for both sexes and both sites, r > 0.93. Depending on total BMD change, participants were grouped into "losers," "nonlosers," and "gainers," and more than 6% lost more than the smallest detectable amount of BMD: ≥3.46% at the distal site and ≥5.14% at the ultradistal site. In both sexes, bone mineral content (grams) decreased, whereas area (centimeters squared) increased significantly in "losers" compared with "gainers." This finding might represent physiologic compensation preserving bone strength. No cohort effects were observed when 1994 and 2001 measures from similar age groups were compared.

bone density; bone development; densitometry; follow-up studies; forearm; longitudinal studies; men; women


Abbreviations: BMAD, bone mineral apparent density; BMC, bone mineral content; BMD, bone mineral density


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
T. Wilsgaard, N. Emaus, L. A. Ahmed, G. Grimnes, R. M. Joakimsen, T. K. Omsland, and G. R. Berntsen
Lifestyle Impact on Lifetime Bone Loss in Women and Men: The Tromso Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2009; 169(7): 877 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J EndocrinolHome page
A. Bjornerem, L. A. Ahmed, R. M. Joakimsen, G. K R. Berntsen, V. Fonnebo, L. Jorgensen, P. Oian, E. Seeman, and B. Straume
A prospective study of sex steroids, sex hormone-binding globulin, and non-vertebral fractures in women and men: the Tromso Study
Eur. J. Endocrinol., July 1, 2007; 157(1): 119 - 125.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.