American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on June 29, 2005
American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 162(3):267-278; doi:10.1093/aje/kwi187
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
When Is Baseline Adjustment Useful in Analyses of Change? An Example with Education and Cognitive Change
1 Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
2 Department of Environmental Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
3 Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA
Reprint requests to Dr. M. Maria Glymour, Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Landmark Center West, Room 403J, 401 Park Drive, Boston, MA 02215 (e-mail: mglymour{at}hsph.harvard.edu).
In research on the determinants of change in health status, a crucial analytic decision is whether to adjust for baseline health status. In this paper, the authors examine the consequences of baseline adjustment, using for illustration the question of the effect of educational attainment on change in cognitive function in old age. With data from the US-based Assets and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old survey (n = 5,726; born before 1924), they show that adjustment for baseline cognitive test score substantially inflates regression coefficient estimates for the effect of schooling on change in cognitive test scores compared with models without baseline adjustment. To explain this finding, they consider various plausible assumptions about relations among variables. Each set of assumptions is represented by a causal diagram. The authors apply simple rules for assessing causal diagrams to demonstrate that, in many plausible situations, baseline adjustment induces a spurious statistical association between education and change in cognitive score. More generally, when exposures are associated with baseline health status, this bias can arise if change in health status preceded baseline assessment or if the dependent variable measurement is unreliable or unstable. In some cases, change-score analyses without baseline adjustment provide unbiased causal effect estimates when baseline-adjusted estimates are biased.
bias (epidemiology); cognition; educational status; epidemiologic methods; longitudinal studies; models, statistical; neuropsychological tests; regression analysis
Abbreviations: DAG, directed acyclic graph; AHEAD, Assets and Health Dynamics Among the Oldest Old
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
L Richiardi, F Barone-Adesi, F Merletti, and N Pearce Using directed acyclic graphs to consider adjustment for socioeconomic status in occupational cancer studies. J. Epidemiol. Community Health, July 1, 2008; 62(7): e14 - e14. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Virtanen, J. Vahtera, U. Broms, L. Sillanmaki, M. Kivimaki, and M. Koskenvuo Employment trajectory as determinant of change in health-related lifestyle: the prospective HeSSup study Eur J Public Health, May 31, 2008; (2008) ckn037v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Glymour Invited Commentary: When Bad Genes Look Good--APOE*E4, Cognitive Decline, and Diagnostic Thresholds Am. J. Epidemiol., June 1, 2007; 165(11): 1239 - 1246. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Berry Does money buy better health? Unpacking the income to health association after midlife Health (London) , April 1, 2007; 11(2): 199 - 226. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Alley, K. Suthers, and E. Crimmins Education and Cognitive Decline in Older Americans: Results From the AHEAD Sample Research on Aging, January 1, 2007; 29(1): 73 - 94. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. M. Glymour and J. Weuve THE FIRST TWO AUTHORS REPLY Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2006; 164(11): 1139 - 1140. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Cologne RE: "WHEN IS BASELINE ADJUSTMENT USEFUL IN ANALYSES OF CHANGE? AN EXAMPLE WITH EDUCATION AND COGNITIVE CHANGE" Am. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2006; 164(11): 1138 - 1139. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||




