Skip Navigation


American Journal of Epidemiology Advance Access originally published online on June 22, 2005
American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 162(2):193-194; doi:10.1093/aje/kwi178
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
162/2/193    most recent
kwi178v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Buchanich, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Madrigano, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Buchanich, J. M.
Right arrow Articles by Madrigano, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

American Journal of Epidemiology Copyright © 2005 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health All rights reserved

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Underascertainment of Deaths using Social Security Records: A Recommended Solution to a Little-Known Problem

Jeanine M. Buchanich1, David G. Dolan2, Gary M. Marsh1 and Jaime Madrigano2

1 Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
2 Merck & Company, Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ

Reprint requests to Jeanine M. Buchanich, Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, A446 Crabtree Hall, 130 DeSoto Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 (e-mail: jeanine{at}pitt.edu).

Complete and accurate ascertainment of vital status is of great importance in cohort studies. Recently, during the vital status ascertainment phase of an ongoing occupational mortality study, the authors discovered a potentially serious problem with use of the Pension Benefit Information Company's tracing service or any tracing that relies on records from the Social Security Administration (SSA) Death Master File to identify deaths. Their investigation revealed that a number of US states restrict the information in the SSA's Death Master File that is available to researchers and the public as a source of death information. As a result of these findings, the authors recommend a revised two-stage vital status tracing protocol. For stage I, data on all subjects for whom vital status is unconfirmed should be sent to the SSA. For stage II, information on all subjects to whom SSA assigned an unknown vital status as well as all subjects whom SSA identified as known decedents should be submitted to the National Death Index. This new protocol will enable researchers to maximize vital status ascertainment while containing costs associated with death identification.

cause of death; cohort studies; contact tracing; records; social security

Abbreviations: NDI, National Death Index; PBI, Pension Benefit Information Company; SSA, Social Security Administration


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.