Skip Navigation

American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 161(5):452-461; doi:10.1093/aje/kwi069
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gierach, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ness, R. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gierach, G. L.
Right arrow Articles by Ness, R. B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2005 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Relations of Gestational Length and Timing and Type of Incomplete Pregnancy to Ovarian Cancer Risk

Gretchen L. Gierach , Francesmary Modugno and Roberta B. Ness

From the Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, and the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

While the protective nature of parity with respect to ovarian cancer has been well documented, whether a history of incomplete pregnancy affects ovarian cancer risk is uncertain. Data collected from 739 epithelial ovarian cancer cases and 1,313 community controls in the Delaware Valley from 1994 to 1998 were used to evaluate the relation between gestational length and timing of first induced or spontaneous abortion and ovarian cancer risk. Incomplete pregnancy was not associated with ovarian cancer among nulliparous women or among ever-pregnant women either before or after adjustment for relevant confounders (for nulliparous women, odds ratio (OR) = 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.66, 1.89; for ever-pregnant women, OR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.76, 1.18). Among unigravid women, one full-term pregnancy was more protective than an incomplete pregnancy (adjusted OR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.57). These results were independent of the type of pregnancy loss. Among ever-pregnant women, a spontaneous abortion before a first birth provided significant protection (adjusted OR = 0.47, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.75), while no significant effect was found for an induced abortion prior to a first birth (adjusted OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.44, 1.47). These data do not support an independent association between incomplete pregnancies, either spontaneous or induced, and ovarian cancer risk.

abortion, induced; abortion, spontaneous; case-control studies; humans; ovarian neoplasms; pregnancy


Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; OR, odds ratio.


Correspondence to Gretchen L. Gierach, Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, 3520 5th Avenue, Suite 510, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 (e-mail: glg1{at}pitt.edu).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Hum ReprodHome page
A. Melin, P. Sparen, and A. Bergqvist
The risk of cancer and the role of parity among women with endometriosis
Hum. Reprod., November 1, 2007; 22(11): 3021 - 3026.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. B. Greer, F. Modugno, G. O. Allen, and R. B. Ness
Short-Term Oral Contraceptive Use and the Risk of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer
Am. J. Epidemiol., July 1, 2005; 162(1): 66 - 72.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.