Skip Navigation

American Journal of Epidemiology 2005 161(3):289-296; doi:10.1093/aje/kwi044
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Promislow, J. H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sandler, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Promislow, J. H. E.
Right arrow Articles by Sandler, D. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2005 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Maternal Recall of Breastfeeding Duration by Elderly Women

Joanne H. E. Promislow1 , Beth C. Gladen2 and Dale P. Sandler1

1 Epidemiology Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.
2 Biostatistics Branch, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Studies of long-term effects of breastfeeding on the health of both infants and mothers often rely on maternal recall of breastfeeding duration after several decades. The authors evaluated this recall by 140 college-educated, US women 69–79 years of age who breastfed a child in 1940–1956 and recorded the duration both prospectively in a diary for the Menstruation and Reproductive History Study and retrospectively in a questionnaire in 1990–1991. Mean prospective breastfeeding duration was 5.6 months (range, 1–12 months). Mean reporting difference, questionnaire minus diary duration, was 0.0 months, with a standard deviation of 2.7 months; women who recorded short durations tended to overreport, while women who noted long durations underreported. The weighted kappa statistic for reporting agreement was 0.55 (95% confidence interval: 0.42, 0.67), with better recall observed for women in the youngest quintile at recall, firstborns, and infants with more siblings. Ever having breastfed was recalled by 94% of women. For categories of 1–3, 4–6, 7–9, and 10–12 months, recalled breastfeeding duration was correctly classified by 54% of women and was classified within ±1 category by 89%. The observed misclassification, if nondifferential with respect to outcome, would appreciably attenuate estimates of dose-response associations between breastfeeding duration and later health.

bias (epidemiology); breast feeding; epidemiologic methods; mental recall; reproductive history; validation studies


Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval.


Correspondence to Dr. Joanne Promislow, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, P.O. Box 12233, MD A3-05, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709 (e-mail: promisl1{at}niehs.nih.gov).


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
A. Wigertz, S. Lonn, P. Hall, A. Auvinen, H. C. Christensen, C. Johansen, L. Klaeboe, T. Salminen, M. J. Schoemaker, A. J. Swerdlow, et al.
Reproductive Factors and Risk of Meningioma and Glioma
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2008; 17(10): 2663 - 2670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
G. K. Singh, M. D. Kogan, and D. L. Dee
Nativity/Immigrant Status, Race/Ethnicity, and Socioeconomic Determinants of Breastfeeding Initiation and Duration in the United States, 2003
Pediatrics, February 1, 2007; 119(Supplement_1): S38 - S46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.