Skip Navigation

American Journal of Epidemiology 2004 160(8):797-807; doi:10.1093/aje/kwh288
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nishiwaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nishiwaki, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Fletcher, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Copyright © 2004 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY

Validity of the Clock-Drawing Test as a Screening Tool for Cognitive Impairment in the Elderly

Yuji Nishiwaki1, Elizabeth Breeze1, Liam Smeeth1, Christopher J. Bulpitt2, Ruth Peters2 and Astrid E. Fletcher1 

1 Centre for Ageing and Public Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
2 Section of Care of the Elderly, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College of Science, Technology, and Medicine, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

The authors studied the validity of the Clock-Drawing Test (CDT) in comparison with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the association between the CDT and mortality in a large general population sample of persons aged 75 years or more. Data were obtained from the MRC Trial of the Assessment and Management of Older People in the Community. Baseline assessments were conducted between 1995 and 1999 in the United Kingdom. A total of 13,557 subjects with both CDT and MMSE scores were included in the analysis. The median follow-up period was 4.7 years. The sensitivity and specificity of the CDT for detecting moderate-to-severe cognitive impairment (MMSE score ≤ 17) were 77% and 87%, respectively, for nurse administration and 40% and 91%, respectively, for postal administration. Sensitivity was higher among females and increased with age. In Cox proportional hazards regression, a worse CDT score was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality and mortality from cerebrovascular and respiratory diseases, even after adjustment for potential confounders. The authors conclude that the CDT may have value as a brief face-to-face screening tool for moderate/severe cognitive impairment in an older community population but is relatively poor at detecting milder cognitive impairment.

aged; cognition; mass screening; mortality; sensitivity and specificity

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: CDT, Clock-Drawing Test; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
QJMHome page
H.J. Woodford and J. George
Cognitive assessment in the elderly: a review of clinical methods
QJM, August 1, 2007; 100(8): 469 - 484.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Munshi, L. Grande, M. Hayes, D. Ayres, E. Suhl, R. Capelson, S. Lin, W. Milberg, and K. Weinger
Cognitive Dysfunction Is Associated With Poor Diabetes Control in Older Adults
Diabetes Care, August 1, 2006; 29(8): 1794 - 1799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
S. G. Parker, D. Bechinger-English, C. Jagger, N. Spiers, and J. Lindesay
Factors affecting completion of the SF-36 in older people
Age Ageing, July 1, 2006; 35(4): 376 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.