Copyright © 2004 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Influence of Study Population on the Identification of Risk Factors for Sexually Transmitted Diseases using a Case-Control Design: The Example of Gonorrhea
1 Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
3 National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
4 Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
5 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
The population prevalence of many sexually transmitted diseases (STDs) is low. Thus, most epidemiologic studies of STDs are conducted among STD clinic populations to maximize efficiency. However, STD clinic patients have unique sociobehavioral characteristics. To examine the potential effect of study population on identification of risk factors, the authors compared 1) STD clinic patients with a random digit dialing telephone sample, 2) general population cases with random digit dialing controls, and 3) STD clinic cases with STD clinic controls (Seattle, Washington, 1992–1995). Risk factors for gonorrhea identified among STD clinic patients formed a subset of those identified in the general population. In both populations, risk decreased with age (odds ratio for the general population (ORGP) = 0.4, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22, 0.59; odds ratio for the clinic population (ORclinic) = 0.5, 95% CI: 0.30, 0.81) and was increased among Blacks (ORGP = 15.5, 95% CI: 4.93, 49.0; ORclinic = 10.5, 95% CI: 4.51, 24.68) and persons whose partner had been jailed (ORGP = 5.4, 95% CI: 2.07, 13.9; ORclinic = 3.1, 95% CI: 1.32, 7.30). Additional factors associated with gonorrhea in the general population included secondary education (OR = 0.3, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.70), anal intercourse (OR = 10.5, 95% CI: 2.01, 54.7, STD history (OR = 5.9, 95% CI: 1.76, 19.5), meeting partners in structured settings (OR = 0.2, 95% CI: 0.09, 0.50), no condom use (OR = 3.2, 95% CI: 1.30, 7.89), and divorce (OR = 3.6, 95% CI: 1.07, 11.9). Risk factors identified in STD clinics will probably be confirmed in a general population sample, despite overcontrolling for shared behaviors; however, factors associated with both disease and STD clinic attendance may be missed.
case-control studies; gonorrhea; risk factors; sexually transmitted diseases
Abbreviations: Abbreviations: RDD, random digit dialing; STD(s), sexually transmitted disease(s).
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Scoular, K. Abu-Rajab, A. Winter, J. Connell, and G. Hart The case for social marketing in gonorrhoea prevention: insights from sexual lifestyles in Glasgow genitourinary medicine clinic attendees Int J STD AIDS, August 1, 2008; 19(8): 545 - 549. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. A. Wang, A. B. Harvey, S. M. Conner, A. A. Zaidi, J. S. Knapp, W. L.H. Whittington, C. del Rio, F. N. Judson, and K. K. Holmes Antimicrobial Resistance for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in the United States, 1988 to 2003: The Spread of Fluoroquinolone Resistance Ann Intern Med, July 17, 2007; 147(2): 81 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. E. Manhart, K. K. Holmes, J. P. Hughes, L. S. Houston, and P. A. Totten Mycoplasma genitalium Among Young Adults in the United States: An Emerging Sexually Transmitted Infection Am J Public Health, June 1, 2007; 97(6): 1118 - 1125. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S O Aral Sexual risk behaviour and infection: epidemiological considerations Sex. Transm. Inf., December 1, 2004; 80(suppl_2): ii8 - ii12. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|