Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ruttenber, A. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brown, S. C.
Right arrow Articles by Ruttenber, A. J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2004; 160:163-172.
Copyright © 2004 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Lung Cancer and Internal Lung Doses among Plutonium Workers at the Rocky Flats Plant: A Case-Control Study

Shannon C. Brown1 , Margaret F. Schonbeck2, David McClure3, Anna E. Barón3, William C. Navidi4, Tim Byers3 and A. James Ruttenber3

1 Department of Health Policy and Management, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
2 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, Denver, CO.
3 Department of Preventive Medicine and Biometrics, Health Sciences Center, University of Colorado, Denver, CO.
4 Department of Mathematical and Computer Sciences, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO.

The authors conducted a nested case-control study of the association between lung cancer mortality and cumulative internal lung doses among a cohort of workers employed at the Rocky Flats Plant in Colorado from 1951 to 1989. Cases (n = 180) were individually matched with controls (n = 720) on age, sex, and birth year. Annual doses to the lung from plutonium, americium, and uranium isotopes were calculated for each worker with an internal dosimetry model. Lung cancer risk was elevated among workers with cumulative internal lung doses of more than 400 mSv in several different analytical models. The dose-response relation was not consistent at high doses. Restricting analysis to those employed for 15–25 years produced a statistically significant linear trend with dose (chi-square = 67.2, p < 0.001), suggesting a strong healthy worker survivor effect. The association between age at first internal lung dose and lung cancer mortality was statistically significant (odds ratio = 1.05, 95% confidence interval: 1.01, 1.10). No associations were found between lung cancer mortality and cumulative external penetrating radiation dose or cumulative exposures to asbestos, beryllium, hexavalent chromium, or nickel.

lung neoplasms; occupational exposure; plutonium; radiation

Abbreviations: Abbreviation: CINDY, Code for Internal Dosimetry.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
M K Schubauer-Berigan, J A Deddens, K Steenland, W T Sanderson, and M R Petersen
Adjustment for temporal confounders in a reanalysis of a case-control study of beryllium and lung cancer
Occup. Environ. Med., June 1, 2008; 65(6): 379 - 383.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Radiat Prot DosimetryHome page
R. D. Daniels, C. J. Lodwick, M. K. Schubauer-Berigan, and H. B. Spitz
Assessment of plutonium exposures for an epidemiological study of US nuclear workers
Radiat Prot Dosimetry, April 1, 2006; 118(1): 43 - 55.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.