Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kliukiene, J.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kliukiene, J.
Right arrow Articles by Andersen, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159:852-861.
Copyright © 2004 by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Residential and Occupational Exposures to 50-Hz Magnetic Fields and Breast Cancer in Women: A Population-based Study

Jolanta Kliukiene1 , Tore Tynes1,2 and Aage Andersen1

1 The Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of Population-based Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.
2 Norwegian Radiation Protection Authority, Østerås, Norway.

A case-control study was conducted to investigate whether residential and occupational exposures to magnetic fields increased the risk for breast cancer among women. Cases of breast cancer diagnosed during 1980–1996 were identified in a cohort of women living near a high-voltage power line in Norway in 1980 or between 1986 and 1996. Each case was matched by year of birth, municipality, and first year of entry into the cohort with two randomly selected controls without cancer. Residential exposure to magnetic fields was calculated as that generated by the lines before diagnosis, and occupational exposure was based on exposure matrix data. Women with residential exposure had an odds ratio of 1.58 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.30, 1.92) when compared with unexposed women. The odds ratios for exposed women versus unexposed women with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive and ER-negative breast cancer were 1.33 (95% CI: 0.93, 1.90) and 1.40 (95% CI: 0.78, 2.50), respectively (ER status was available for 44% of the cases). Women with the highest occupational exposure had an odds ratio of 1.13 (95% CI: 0.91, 1.40) when compared with those unexposed at work. The findings suggest an association between exposure to magnetic fields and breast cancer in women.

breast neoplasms; electromagnetic fields; receptors, estrogen

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ER, estrogen receptor.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Occup. Environ. Med.Home page
L Kheifets, J D Bowman, H Checkoway, M Feychting, J M Harrington, R Kavet, G Marsh, G Mezei, D C Renew, and E van Wijngaarden
Future needs of occupational epidemiology of extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields: review and recommendations
Occup. Environ. Med., February 1, 2009; 66(2): 72 - 80.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
U. M. Forssen, L. E. Rutqvist, A. Ahlbom, and M. Feychting
Occupational Magnetic Fields and Female Breast Cancer: A Case-Control Study using Swedish Population Registers and New Exposure Data
Am. J. Epidemiol., February 1, 2005; 161(3): 250 - 259.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Evid. Based Nurs.Home page
23 Apr 2004 to 23 Jul 2004
Evid. Based Nurs., October 1, 2004; 7(4): e4 - e4.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.