Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159:1095-1097.
Copyright © 2004 by the Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Self-Assessment of Circumcision Status by Adolescents
1 Department of Epidemiology, Center for Infectious Diseases, University of Texas-Houston School of Public Health, Houston, TX.
2 Department of Adolescent Medicine, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX.
3 Joint Primary Care Fellowship, Department of Family Practice and Department of Adolescent Medicine, University of Texas-Houston Medical School, Houston, TX.
In epidemiologic studies of the relation between circumcision and sexually transmitted infections, it is necessary to rely on self-report of circumcision status. The purpose of this 2002 study in Houston, Texas, was to determine whether adolescent males could make correct self-reports. During physical examinations, adolescents were asked whether they were circumcised. The authors then examined the adolescents’ genitalia. Circumcision status was recorded as complete (glans penis fully exposed), partial (glans partly covered), or uncircumcised (glans completely covered). The mean age of the 1,508 subjects was 15.0 (standard deviation, 1.63) years; 64% were Black, 29% Hispanic, and 7% White. Forty-nine percent had full, 1% partial, and 50% no circumcision. Of the 738 fully circumcised subjects, 512 (69%) considered themselves circumcised, 54 (7%) considered themselves uncircumcised, and 172 (23%) did not know. Of the 751 uncircumcised youth, 491 (65%) described themselves as uncircumcised, 27 (4%) reported being circumcised, and 233 (31%) did not know. The sensitivity of self-report among those who thought they knew their status was 90.5%, and the specificity was 94.8%; 27% did not know their status. In this population, self-report of circumcision status did not result in accurate information mainly because many adolescents were unsure of their status.
adolescent; circumcision; male; sensitivity and specificity
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D J Templeton, L Mao, G P Prestage, F Jin, J M Kaldor, and A E Grulich Self-report is a valid measure of circumcision status in homosexual men Sex. Transm. Inf., June 1, 2008; 84(3): 187 - 188. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. L Fankem, C. S. Wiysonge, and C. A Hankins Letter to the Editor: Male circumcision and the risk of HIV infection in men who have sex with men Int. J. Epidemiol., April 1, 2008; 37(2): 353 - 355. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|