Am J Epidemiol 2004; 159:94-101.
Copyright © 2004 by the Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Response Rates to a Questionnaire 26 Years after Baseline Examination with Minimal Interim Participant Contact and Baseline Differences between Respondents and Nonrespondents
From the Department of Preventive Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Research on response rates to surveys mailed to study participants decades after baseline examination, with minimal interim contact, is limited. This paper documents response rates to a 26-year follow-up survey of surviving participants from a large cohort in Illinois and compares baseline characteristics of nonrespondents and respondents. Mortality follow-up of the Chicago Heart Association Detection Project in Industry 1967–1973 cohort involved minimal or no participant contact since baseline. In 1996, a 26-year follow-up questionnaire was mailed to all surviving participants aged 65 years or older. Current addresses were obtained from the Health Care Financing Administration for 96.5 percent of 12,409 participants in our analyses. Total response rates were 59.8 percent and, for participants for whom Health Care Financing Administration addresses were available, 60.8 percent. A higher response rate was obtained for younger recipients, men, Whites, more-educated persons, nonsmokers, and those with a better cardiovascular risk profile at baseline. A graded negative relation was found between number of cardiovascular risk factors at baseline and response rates obtained in 1996. Use of Health Care Financing Administration records as an additional follow-up method and factors that influence response rates are discussed. In conclusion, long-term follow-up of older surviving participants is feasible if current addresses can be obtained from standardized sources.
aged; data collection; epidemiologic methods; follow-up studies; health surveys
Abbreviations: Abbreviations: HCFA, Health Care Financing Administration; NCOA, National Change of Address.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. M. Oakes, A. Forsyth, M. O. Hearst, and K. H. Schmitz Recruiting Participants for Neighborhood Effects Research: Strategies and Outcomes of the Twin Cities Walking Study Environment and Behavior, November 1, 2009; 41(6): 787 - 805. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. J. del Junco, S. W. Vernon, S. P. Coan, J. A. Tiro, L. A. Bastian, L. S. Savas, C. A. Perz, D. R. Lairson, W. Chan, C. Warrick, et al. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, March 5, 2008; 100(5): 333 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Gerber, S. J. Jacobsen, J. M. Killian, S. A. Weston, and V. L. Roger Participation Bias Assessment in a Community-Based Study of Myocardial Infarction, 2002-2005 Mayo Clin. Proc., August 1, 2007; 82(8): 933 - 938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|