Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hakim, I. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chen, Z.
Right arrow Articles by Hakim, I. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158:772-781.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Habitual Tea Consumption and Risk of Osteoporosis: A Prospective Study in the Women’s Health Initiative Observational Cohort

Z. Chen1 , M. B. Pettinger2, C. Ritenbaugh3, A. Z. LaCroix2, J. Robbins4, B. J. Caan5, D. H. Barad6 and I. A. Hakim1

1 University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ.
2 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
3 Kaiser Center for Health Research, Portland, OR.
4 University of California at Davis, Sacramento, CA.
5 Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, CA.
6 Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY.

The purpose of this study was to prospectively investigate associations of habitual drinking of regular tea with bone mineral density and fracture risk. Study participants were a multiethnic postmenopausal cohort (n = 91,465) from the nationwide Women’s Health Initiative Observational Study. These women were recruited in the United States and aged 50–79 years at the time of enrollment (1994–1998). The average follow-up time was 4.1 years. Habitual consumption of regular tea was assessed with a structured questionnaire at baseline. Clinical fractures during the follow-up were reported in questionnaires, and hip fractures were further confirmed by reviewing medical records. Bone mineral density measurements were conducted among a subgroup of women (n = 4,979) at three Women’s Health Initiative bone mineral density centers using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. Multivariate analyses suggested a positive trend of increased total body bone mineral density with tea drinking (p < 0.05). However, results from the Cox proportional hazard models did not show any significant association between tea drinking and the risk of fractures at the hip and forearm/wrist. In conclusion, the results from this study indicate that the effect of habitual tea drinking on bone density is small and does not significantly alter the risk of fractures among the US postmenopausal population.

bone density; cohort studies; densitometry; fractures; osteoporosis, postmenopausal; tea; women

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: MEDOS, Mediterranean Osteoporosis; WHI, Women’s Health Initiative.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
A. Devine, J. M Hodgson, I. M Dick, and R. L Prince
Tea drinking is associated with benefits on bone density in older women
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2007; 86(4): 1243 - 1247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
D. L. McKay and J. B. Blumberg
Roles for Epigallocatechin Gallate in Cardiovascular Disease and Obesity: An Introduction
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., August 1, 2007; 26(4): 362S - 365S.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
B. M Popkin, L. E Armstrong, G. M Bray, B. Caballero, B. Frei, and W. C Willett
A new proposed guidance system for beverage consumption in the United States
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, March 1, 2006; 83(3): 529 - 542.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.