Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (14)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morimoto, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Newcomb, P. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morimoto, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Newcomb, P. A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158:259-263.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Selection Bias in the Assessment of Gene-Environment Interaction in Case-Control Studies

Libby M. Morimoto1,2 , Emily White1,2 and Polly A. Newcomb1,2,3

1 Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA.
2 Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
3 University of Wisconsin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Madison, WI.

Selection bias is a common concern in epidemiologic studies, particularly case-control studies. Selection bias in the odds ratio occurs when participation depends jointly on exposure and disease status. General results for understanding when selection bias may affect studies involving gene-environment interactions have not yet been developed. In this paper, the authors show that the assessment of gene-environment interactions will not be subject to selection bias under the assumption that genotype does not influence participation conditional on exposure and disease status. This is true even when selection, including self-selection of subjects, is jointly influenced by exposure and disease and regardless of whether the genotype is related to exposure, disease, or both. The authors present an example to illustrate this concept.

bias (epidemiology); case-control studies; environment; epidemiologic methods; genotype; polymorphism (genetics); risk factors; selection bias


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
A. E. Cust, H. Schmid, J. A. Maskiell, J. Jetann, M. Ferguson, E. A. Holland, C. Agha-Hamilton, M. A. Jenkins, J. Kelly, R. F. Kefford, et al.
Population-based, Case-Control-Family Design to Investigate Genetic and Environmental Influences on Melanoma Risk: Australian Melanoma Family Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., November 3, 2009; (2009) kwp307v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
C.-H. Chang, C.-F. Hsiao, G.-C. Chang, Y.-H. Tsai, Y.-M. Chen, M.-S. Huang, W.-C. Su, W.-S. Hsieh, P.-C. Yang, C.-J. Chen, et al.
Interactive Effect of Cigarette Smoking With Human 8-Oxoguanine DNA N-Glycosylase 1 (hOGG1) Polymorphisms on the Risk of Lung Cancer: A Case-Control Study in Taiwan
Am. J. Epidemiol., September 15, 2009; 170(6): 695 - 702.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
aacredbookHome page
P. Maruvada and S. Srivastava
Joint National Cancer Institute-Food and Drug Administration Workshop on Research Strategies, Study Designs, and Statistical Approaches to Biomarker Validation for Cancer Diagnosis and Detection
Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. Educ. Book, April 12, 2008; 2008(1): 239 - 247.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. A. Newcomb, J. Baron, M. Cotterchio, S. Gallinger, J. Grove, R. Haile, D. Hall, J. L. Hopper, J. Jass, L. Le Marchand, et al.
Colon Cancer Family Registry: An International Resource for Studies of the Genetic Epidemiology of Colon Cancer
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., November 1, 2007; 16(11): 2331 - 2343.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
S. Landi, F. Gemignani, F. Canzian, V. Gaborieau, R. Barale, D. Landi, N. Szeszenia-Dabrowska, D. Zaridze, J. Lissowska, P. Rudnai, et al.
DNA Repair and Cell Cycle Control Genes and the Risk of Young-Onset Lung Cancer.
Cancer Res., November 15, 2006; 66(22): 11062 - 11069.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
P. Maruvada and S. Srivastava
Joint national cancer institute-food and drug administration workshop on research strategies, study designs, and statistical approaches to biomarker validation for cancer diagnosis and detection.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., June 1, 2006; 15(6): 1078 - 1082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
L. M. Morimoto, P. A. Newcomb, E. White, J. Bigler, and J. D. Potter
Insulin-like Growth Factor Polymorphisms and Colorectal Cancer Risk
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2005; 14(5): 1204 - 1211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. J. Hung, P. Brennan, F. Canzian, N. Szeszenia-Dabrowska, D. Zaridze, J. Lissowska, P. Rudnai, E. Fabianova, D. Mates, L. Foretova, et al.
Large-Scale Investigation of Base Excision Repair Genetic Polymorphisms and Lung Cancer Risk in a Multicenter Study
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 20, 2005; 97(8): 567 - 576.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.