Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Viboud, C.
Right arrow Articles by Flahault, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Viboud, C.
Right arrow Articles by Flahault, A.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158:996-1006.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

Prediction of the Spread of Influenza Epidemics by the Method of Analogues

Cécile Viboud1,2 , Pierre-Yves Boëlle1,3, Fabrice Carrat1,3, Alain-Jacques Valleron1,3 and Antoine Flahault1,2,3

1 Epidemiology and Information Sciences, INSERM Unit 444, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
2 WHO Collaborating Center for Electronic Diseases Surveillance, Paris, France.
3 Assistance Publique–Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France.

This study was designed to examine the performance of a nonparametric forecasting method first developed in meteorology, the "method of analogues," in predicting influenza activity. This method uses vectors selected from historical influenza time series that match current activity. The authors applied it to forecasting the incidences of influenza-like illnesses (ILI) in France and in the country’s 21 administrative regions, using a series of data for 938 consecutive weeks of ILI surveillance between 1984 and 2002, and compared the results with those for autoregressive models. For 1- to 10-week-ahead predictions, the correlation coefficients between the observed and forecasted regional incidences ranged from 0.81 to 0.66 for the method of analogues and from 0.73 to –0.09 for the autoregressive models (p < 0.001). Similar results were obtained for national incidence forecasts. From the results of this method, maps of influenza epidemic forecasts can be made in countries in which national and regional data are available.

communicable disease control; diffusion; epidemiologic methods; forecasting; influenza; statistics, nonparametric

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: CV, cross-validation; ILI, influenza-like illnesses.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 J Public Health (Oxf)Home page
G. Gault, S. Larrieu, C. Durand, L. Josseran, B. Jouves, and L. Filleul
Performance of a syndromic system for influenza based on the activity of general practitioners, France
J. Public Health Med., June 1, 2009; 31(2): 286 - 292.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Scand J Public HealthHome page
E. Andersson, S. Kuhlmann-Berenzon, A. Linde, L. Schioler, S. Rubinova, and M. Frisen
Predictions by early indicators of the time and height of the peaks of yearly influenza outbreaks in Sweden
Scand J Public Health, July 1, 2008; 36(5): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.