Am J Epidemiol 2003; 158:1007-1011.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns
Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health
PRACTICE OF EPIDEMIOLOGY |
Using Publicly Available Directories to Trace Survey Nonresponders and Calculate Adjusted Response Rates
1 Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
2 Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
3 Arthritis Community Research and Evaluation Unit, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
4 Division of Rheumatology, Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
5 Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
6 Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
7 Department of Family and Community Medicine, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
8 Inner City Health Research Unit, St. Michael’s Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
9 Toronto Rehabilitation Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
10 Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
11 Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
In population-based surveys, sample lists are often out of date by the time data collection begins. Consequently, response rates, and the perceived validity of the survey, may be compromised by the unknowing inclusion of ineligible subjects. A strategy to address this issue is ascertainment of survey nonrespondents’ eligibility status, enabling post hoc adjustment of response rates. In 1995–1996, population surveys were carried out in two Ontario, Canada, communities. Despite intensive follow-up, the status of 8,949 (18.6%) of the 48,218 potential subjects in these surveys remained unknown. In response, 500 "unknowns" from each community were randomly selected for tracing by using publicly available telephone directories and, where applicable, city directories. These tracing efforts classified persons into one of three groups: "ineligible" (moved before the mailing), "true nonresponder" (present when the survey was mailed), and "remains unknown" (no directory listing found). Publicly available directories clarified the status of 76.0% of potential participants, reducing the proportion of "unknowns" from 18.6% to 4.6%. Applying the estimated proportions of "ineligibles" from each area resulted in response rates adjusted from 63.8% to 71.2% and from 72.8% to 74.9% in the survey areas. Publicly available directories were used to successfully trace the majority of survey nonresponders, thus strengthening confidence in the survey’s results.
contact tracing; data collection; directories; eligibility determination; nonrespondents
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  D. J. del Junco, S. W. Vernon, S. P. Coan, J. A. Tiro, L. A. Bastian, L. S. Savas, C. A. Perz, D. R. Lairson, W. Chan, C. Warrick, et al. Promoting Regular Mammography Screening I. A Systematic Assessment of Validity in a Randomized Trial J Natl Cancer Inst, March 5, 2008; 100(5): 333 - 346. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|