Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow FREE Full Text (PDF) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (18)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ahdieh-Grant, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, L. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ahdieh-Grant, L.
Right arrow Articles by Jacobson, L. P.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Am J Epidemiol 2003; 157:738-746.
Copyright © 2003 by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health


ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTIONS

When to Initiate Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy: A Cohort Approach

Linda Ahdieh-Grant1,, Traci E. Yamashita1, John P. Phair2, Roger Detels3, Steven M. Wolinsky2, Joseph B. Margolick4, Charles R. Rinaldo5 and Lisa P. Jacobson1

1 Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
2 Northwestern University Medical School and Howard Brown Health Center, Chicago, IL.
3 School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA.
4 Department of Molecular Microbiology and Immunology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD.
5 Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.

The appropriate immunologic stage of human immunodeficiency virus infection at which to initiate highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) among asymptomatic persons is a core question. A cohort approach using longitudinal data from the US Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study was used to mimic a clinical trial to assess the risk of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) by timing of therapy. Three treatment groups were defined according to CD4+ count (cells/µl) at HAART initiation between July 1995 and January 2000: <200 (deferral to <200, n = 127), 200–349 (deferral to 200–349, n = 130), and 350–499 (immediate treatment, n = 92). Survival analysis was used to compare time to AIDS between groups from the index visit until July 2000. The index visit for the immediate group was the one prior to HAART initiation. For the deferral groups, the index visit was a randomly selected, pre-HAART, AIDS-free visit after July 1990 at which CD4+ counts were 350–499 cells/µl. This strategy accounted for lead time bias. Compared with immediate treatment, the relative hazards of AIDS were 2.68 (p = 0.003) and 1.05 (p = 0.897) for deferral to <200 cells/µl and 200–349 cells/µl, respectively. These results support recent US public health guidelines for deferring HAART initiation until a count of <350 cells/µl. Furthermore, results suggest a potential threshold for HAART initiation in the neighborhood of 275 cells/µl.

cohort studies; epidemiologic methods; HIV

Abbreviations: Abbreviations: AIDS, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome; CI, confidence interval; D <200, deferred treatment group of men whose CD4+ counts were <200 cells/µl; D <350, deferred treatment group of men whose CD4+ counts were 200–349 cells/µl; HAART, highly active antiretroviral therapy; HIV, human immunodeficiency virus.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. M. Kitahata, S. J. Gange, A. G. Abraham, B. Merriman, M. S. Saag, A. C. Justice, R. S. Hogg, S. G. Deeks, J. J. Eron, J. T. Brooks, et al.
Effect of Early versus Deferred Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV on Survival
N. Engl. J. Med., April 30, 2009; 360(18): 1815 - 1826.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
S. M. Hammer
Clinical practice. Management of newly diagnosed HIV infection.
N. Engl. J. Med., October 20, 2005; 353(16): 1702 - 1710.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
R. Chou, L. H. Huffman, R. Fu, A. K. Smits, and P. T. Korthuis
Screening for HIV: A Review of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, July 5, 2005; 143(1): 55 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
G. D. Sanders, A. M. Bayoumi, V. Sundaram, S. P. Bilir, C. P. Neukermans, C. E. Rydzak, L. R. Douglass, L. C. Lazzeroni, M. Holodniy, and D. K. Owens
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening for HIV in the Era of Highly Active Antiretroviral Therapy
N. Engl. J. Med., February 10, 2005; 352(6): 570 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic Ill)Home page
F. A. Post and P. J. Easterbrook
Antiretroviral Therapy in Advanced HIV-1 Infection
J Int Assoc Physicians AIDS Care (Chic Ill), January 1, 2005; 4(1): 8 - 15.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Antimicrob ChemotherHome page
L. Waters, J. Stebbing, R. Jones, C. Michailidis, S. Sawleshwarkar, S. Mandalia, M. Bower, M. Nelson, and B. Gazzard
A comparison of the CD4 response to antiretroviral regimens in patients commencing therapy with low CD4 counts
J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 2004; 54(2): 503 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.